SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rigid-body Off-axis Ordnance Shock/Tail-slap Environment Replicator (ROOSTER)

Award identifier 76ba4a3140c85bc24342f133f8f990ab121d84d1dc72578e1fdcf3859abd2e25Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,861

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Omnitek Partners LLC
Proposal award date
2015-07-01
Contract end date
2016-04-15
UEI
LYG3KGM92LR5
Solicitation number
2015.1
Topic code
AF151-104

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:The objective of this project is to develop ordnance shock/tail-slap environment replicator machines that can applying high acceleration/deceleration pulses of over 10,000 g peak over long durations of over 5 msec. The proposal describes two novel classes of shock/tail-slap testing machine concepts for feasibility study. The first novel class of multi-axial shock/tail-slap replicator machines can apply acceleration/deceleration pulses with over 10,000 g peak and around 0.1 msec duration over periods of well over 5 msec. The machines can apply multi-axial shock loading pulses to the ordnance in the axial and lateral directions to simulate almost any shock loading event, including the tail-slap shocks, where large lateral accelerations are introduced due to the bending and rebound of the ordnance in the lateral direction. The second novel class of shock/tail-slap testing machine concepts can achieve high and long duration shock loading to simulate target penetration with the capability of simultaneously applying relatively short duration lateral shock loading to replicate tail-slap shock loading events caused by lateral accelerations that are introduced due to the bending and rebound of the ordnance in the lateral direction. Both concepts provide multi-axial shock testing machines for low-cost, highly repeatable and reusable testing of ordnance.BENEFIT:Although the present shock testing machines are to be developed for specific needs of testing ordnance of various types under various launch and target interaction environments, a technology that can reliably replicate various shock loading events and is highly repeatable, has numerous commercial applications, particularly when tests are at a relatively inexpensive cost. For example, such shock testing machines, designed for testing the effects of acceleration/deceleration events experienced by packaged electronics, instrumentations and various components used in aerospace and various vehicles and appliances that are prone to be dropped and the like will have a wide range of commercial applications. Such machines are particularly useful for product designers since the product to be tested can be readily instrumented and its response and behavior videoed for analysis of determination of performance as well as possible modes of failure.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

49 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2024). Reported award amounts total $22,143,643. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.