SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Power Density GaN-Based Power Converters for Grid-Tied Energy Storage

Award identifier c108628fa7c8a1c5214c8b030876b5046b169d201b3065b9df6cc9c6224b649aAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,997

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Arkansas Power Electronics International, Inc.
Proposal award date
2015-06-08
Contract end date
2016-03-07
UEI
QZMVB44SHW19
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001227
Topic code
10b

Research abstract

Power generation and transmission limits manifest themselves in the inability to respond to dynamic peak power demand. Load leveling can effectively support dynamic demand changes by having additional standby power generating capabilities. This is achieved by either 1) having a generation and distribution infrastructure that matches the peak demand and it is operated under its full capacity spinning reserve) or 2) having additional power plants that can be brought online to provide additional power. These methods, though effective, are economically costly because power generators are underutilized, likely operating at a lower efficiency point, or because power generating infrastructures are left unused for large portions of time. Grid-connected energy storage systems are intended to enhance performance and reliability of the utility infrastructure. Unlike load-leveling methods, grid-tied energy storage solutions can provide the flexibility to react to dynamic peak power demands in an economical manner. By storing energy during off-peak power demand and releasing it during peak demand, grid-tied energy storage systems can effectively shift the dynamic power demand profile seen by the grid infrastructure. In this regard, grid-tied energy storage systems are an attractive alternative to improve the performance of the current grid infrastructure. The trend in energy storage systems is to package the energy storage element alongside the power electronics into a standard shipping container. A containerized energy storage system yields many logistical advantages for transportation and deployment. Containerized energy storage solutions require the minimization of the associated power electronics in order to provide more volume for energy storage devices. The power electronics minimization requirement is exacerbated by the need to still operate at high efficiency to minimize power loss and therefore minimize operating cost. There is currently a need to develop minimal volume power electronics to interface with grid-tied energy storage systems in the physical confinement of a containerized application. Consequently, APEI is proposing to develop a high efficiency, high power density >75 kW at > 2 state-of-the-art designs), transformer-less, GaN- based three-phase > 480Vac output, grid-tied inverter for interfacing with containerized energy storage systems. A GaN-based power topology will be designed to enable bi-directional power flow to support energy storage. As such, there is an incentive to pursue size reduction of the passive components associated with switched- mode power conversion. GaN power switches can efficiently operate at high switching frequencies. One of the key benefits of high frequency operation is the significant reduction in size of the transformer used in the power conversion system. APEI has successfully implemented GaN-based systems capable of operating in the MHz range while still providing high efficiency as seen in Error! Reference source not found.. Furthermore, since GaN die have the capability to operate at higher temperatures, simpler cooling systems can be utilized to further reduce packaging size and complexity. The United States consumed approximately 3,800 TWh of electricity in 2012. At such a massive level, even small increases in efficiency can have a prominent impact. Assuming that 30% of the yearly total is processed by power electronics at 85% efficiency, for every 1% average efficiency increase, there would be an annual cost savings of over $2 billion at $0.15 per kWh [ ]) and a reduction of 25 billion lbm of CO2 emissions assuming 1.77 lbm of CO2 per kWh) in the United States alone [ ]. The significance of efficiency is accelerated even further as the proliferation of available sources for readily harvestable energy increases and a growing focus is placed on renewable electric resources such as wind, solar, and tidal. Improvements in the efficiency and power density of the requisite power converters in electric systems ranging from grid-tied energy generation and storage to transportation-based power systems will have a substantial impact as less energy is wasted and more weight and volume in a system may be utilized elsewhere additional battery capacity, etc.).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

59 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2015). Reported award amounts total $19,645,087. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.