SBIR/STTR Research Award

Spectroscopic Monitor of Fuel Rod Integrity in Dry Storage Casks

Award identifier 4cb28bb1a61b9ad2bc18b891405e1fb8d6181dbcc0d151f2429f4a01a2ec32ffAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Energy Research Company
Proposal award date
2015-06-08
Contract end date
2016-03-07
UEI
F73PML6U3L49
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001227
Topic code
33a

Research abstract

Energy Research Company ERCo), in collaboration with the Safeguards Science and Technology Group at Los Alamos National Laboratory, proposes the development of a monitor of fuel rod integrity in spent nuclear fuel storage casks that utilizes spectroscopic measurements. Currently, dry storage casks are the only storage option for spent nuclear fuel in the United States once the fuel is cool enough to be removed from the spent fuel pool. In the absence of a domestic long term storage site or fuel reprocessing plant, the fuel rods will remain in these casks. However, there is no method for inspecting the integrity of fuel rods over time without opening the casks and removing the rods for inspection. The proposed sensor will allow for determining the integrity of the fuel rods from outside the cask. Gases are released from spent fuel rods that fracture. Since dry storage casks are filled with pure helium, no other gases are present in the cask at the time it is sealed. Detecting other gases inside the cask is therefore equivalent to detecting a failing fuel rod. The spectroscopic monitor will be capable of detecting the small quantities of gases in a cask that would be released from a single fractured rod. The concept will be proven in Phase I by making measurements of a gas that is released by a fractured fuel rod using the proposed spectroscopic method in a realistic optical configuration for a dry storage cask. These measurements will yield the design parameters necessary for designing and building a prototype in Phase II. With the concept proved, we will approach cask manufacturers for collaborations in Phase II and beyond. The direct commercial application is for monitoring dry storage casks at nuclear power stations and other locations. As of 2010, 63 licenses for spent fuel dry storage sites have been issued. The Nuclear Energy Institute predicts that by 2026, all but 3 of the 100 currently operating nuclear power reactors will require dry storage for their spent fuel. In addition to the dry storage cask application, we also plan to utilize the technology developed in this project to improve monitoring of nuclear materials in other contexts.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2023). Reported award amounts total $7,984,845. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.