SBIR/STTR Research Award

Process Optimization of Needled Carbon/ silica carbide (C/SiC) Structural Insulators

Award identifier ad487c18fb271b80bc5f34461c1a17307ba63038f60ecd6c792645747dc526c5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$999,960

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
MATERIALS RESEARCH & DESIGN INC
Proposal award date
2015-05-18
Contract end date
2017-05-17
UEI
QU1NM7F1CDV4
Solicitation number
2013.2
Topic code
MDA13-025

Research abstract

Some missiles employ a throttleable divert and altitude control system (TDACS) to maneuver the kill vehicle to the target. Hot gas valve components in the TDACS must survive long burn times at high pressures and high temperatures. Recently the team of Materials Research & Design (MR&D), Allcomp, and Southern Research Institute (SoRI) has developed a needled C/SiC composite that exhibits strengths that are equivalent to Novoltex (the present TDACS material) and less conductive than Novoltex. The composite is fabricated with commercial needled brake preforms, a commercial pre-ceramic polymer, and a unique heat treatment cycle that maintains strength while reducing conductivity. Aerojet tests of the new material (identified as 16A) resulted in five of six successful rocket motor firings. The failure was due to a broken pintle that was traced back to poor Z fiber distribution in the commercial brake (Gen 4) preform. The recently completed Phase I program addressed the composite failure by fabricating and characterizing C/SiC composites made with Allcomps recently developed, domestically available, needled carbon fiber preform (Gen 7). The Phase I data showed 16A composites from Gen 7 preforms led to thermal conductivities, Z tensile strengths, and inplane flex strengths that were equal to or better than those from Gen 4 preforms. Furthermore, C/SiC composites using improved Allcomp preforms (Gen 8) have performed very well in recent, more aggressive, Aerojet-funded rocket motor tests. The objectives of the proposed Phase II are 1) to continue the development of 16A composites using the new Allcomp needled preforms (Gen 8 or 9), and 2) transition the composites to future TDACS hardware. The low thermal conductivity and high strength of the 16A material translate directly into smaller valve hardware, more compact motors, and longer burn times. The Phase II program will be performed by the team of MR&D, Allcomp, SoRI, and Aerojet. MR&D will design and analyze hardware for ground test evaluation, Allcomp will fabricate the materials, SoRI will develop a property database to support the design, and Aerojet will guide the material development and perform rocket motor tests. Approved for Public Release 15-MDA-8169 (20 March 15)

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

133 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $60,564,982. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.