SBIR/STTR Research Award

Robust, low-cost micro-linac as a replacement for Ir-192 radiography sources

Award identifier 412f1072089398850c77c6adfa95b79caf24c2afb2d40b2ae60e0422ee081740Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,600

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM SYSTEMS, LLC
Proposal award date
2015-04-06
Contract end date
2017-04-05
UEI
GRKLZTXQZXE6
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001193
Topic code
22b

Research abstract

To improve public security and prevent the diversion of radioactive material for Radiation Dispersion Devices (or so-called dirty bombs) DOE is planning to dramatically reduce the amount of radioactive material in use. Ir-192 is the most common isotope used for radiography and poses a higher risk of being diverted since it must constantly be replenished, and is found in small, portable devices that nevertheless contain dangerous amounts of material. The existing technology of RF linacs based on sophisticated multi-cup copper structures is too complicated and expensive to be compatible with massive replacement.RadiaBeam is developing an inexpensive, energy-tunable, portable linac based on easy-to-manufacture, structure to allow effective capture of tens of keV electron beam injected from an inexpensive electron gun and acceleration to a final energy up to 1 MeV. The structure design significantly simplifies brazing, eliminates time consuming tuning due to the high group velocity in common tube housing. The bremsstrahlung X-rays produced by the ~1 MeV electron beam on a high-Z converter at the end of the linac will match the penetration and dose rate of a typical 200 Ci Ir-192 source.A two-section, hybrid Alumina-Copper, easy-to-fabricate, disk-and-ring-type structure has been designed. The novel design eliminates multi-cell brazing and expensive RF windows as combines them with the couplers. Assembling of the structure is as simple as stuffing of a pipe with the CNC-milled disks and ring. The simulations indicate attaining of a 1.2 MeV energy for a more than 10 mA current with low power ~100 kW X-band magnetron. Seven cells (~1/6th) of the structure have been fabricated at the cost of $180 per cell. Test mockup with the 7 cells driven by a 14 keV electron gun from L3 have been built with novel designs of vacuum port and alternating periodic permanent focusing. Up to 30 mA have been transported through the 7 cells at 50% transmission up to 30 Hz rep rate at better than 0.1 nbar pressure without indications of damage. In Phase II project we are going to design, fabricate and commission the X-ray source based on the novel type structure to match the penetration and dose rate of a typical 200 Ci Ir-192 source. In Phase II we demonstrate suitability of the system for mass production and feasibility of attaining 40 lbs weight of the system.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

61 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2025). Reported award amounts total $34,857,770. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.