SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Novel, Aerodynamics-augmented Continuous Ionization System for Electrostatic Collection of Bioaerosols

Award identifier e85bb142531e375918f84e135cd06e01926cbb465bd4eb675e9fd460a7d19366Awarding agency Department of Defense · Office for Chemical and Biological Defense

Award amount

$995,404

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2015-02-10
Contract end date
2015-01-15
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
2012.2
Topic code
CBD12-107

Research abstract

Safe and efficient ionization and filtration technology compatible to biodefense applications is of paramount importance. Current ionization methods are energy-intensive, costly, prone to ozone generation, or inefficient, and consequently ill-suited for building protection applications. To overcome these limitations, we propose to develop and demonstrate a novel bioaerosol ionization and collection system for autonomous, round-the-clock air filtration and critical infrastructure protection. The proposed device harnesses advanced aerodynamics-augmented ionizer design and electrode optimization to enable significant improvement in throughput, ionization efficiency, ozone generation, and maintenance requirements and operating cost. In Phase I, key technology concepts were successfully demonstrated. Several ionizer design concepts (electrospray and bipolar ionization) were assessed using physics-based simulations, followed by state-of-the-art fabrication and engineering. Experimental testing and characterization were undertaken to demonstrate salient performance and establish proof-of-principle of the proposed technology. In Phase II, efforts will focus on design optimization, extensive experimental characterization for enhanced performance (e.g., energy consumption, collection efficiency), ease of operation, maintenance requirements, and manufacturability. The most promising ionization and collection mechanisms will be down-selected to develop a pilot-scale prototype. The prototype will be extensively demonstrated for filtering surrogate bioaerosols in a variety of operating conditions (temperature, humidity levels, particle loading etc.) at throughputs up to 2,000 CFM. A multi-disciplinary team with experience in all aspects of the proposed effort including electrostatics, microbiology, modeling and design, prototype fabrication and experimentation, systems engineering, and biodefense has been assembled to ensure successful completion of project milestones.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.