SBIR/STTR Research Award

Digital Aircraft Data Storage

Award identifier 98cff4551069da71b700cd4b2435e2e0b5a7a5a77dd4cb68b06f8b865499e678Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,198,851

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Physical Optics Corporation
Proposal award date
2014-11-18
Contract end date
2017-12-31
UEI
DG3AB4E8R4D8
Solicitation number
2013.2
Topic code
AF132-001

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:To address the Air Forces need for an open systems architecture data transfer device (DTD), Physical Optics Corporation (POC) proposes to develop a Digital Aircraft Data Storage (DADS) that provides a solution maintaining compatibility with existing mission planning equipment (MPE) and aircraft data transfer and recording sources.This addresses MPE media obsolescence while providing a compatible solution with legacy aircraft that lays the foundation for an option to execute a longer-term strategy that completes the avionics modernization of the digital media and the data recording systems throughout the USAF. In Phase I, POC developed a data transfer unit (DTU) and DTD for the F-15 platform as identified by the USAF. We also analyzed each platform selected for evaluation (F-15, F-16, A-10) with its currently deployed DTU and DTD, focusing on the interfaces between the DTD media and the DTU. DADS requires no aircraft harness rewiring or Operational Flight Program modifications. In Phase II, POC will further develop two distinct prototypes for a demonstration showing DADS compatibility on two aircraft platforms. This will include incorporating encryption of all data using data-at-rest encryption techniques. An optional ability to connect to a crash survivable memory unit is provided.BENEFIT:DADS immediately addresses the Air Forces critical near-term obsolescence issues with current aircraft data transfer devices that are based on obsolete/aging technologies, such as PCMCIA and magnetic disks, by providing a digital media storage solution that is compatible with existing equipment and uses open-system standards.This approach gives the Air Force a low-risk strategy to mitigate immediate obsolescence issues and supports an optional path for longer-term growth to a fully modern digital storage solution.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,933 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2021). Reported award amounts total $549,686,800. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.