SBIR/STTR Research Award

Delivery of passive immunity against HIV using commensal vaginal Lactobacillus bioengineered to secrete broadly neutralizing domain antibodies

Award identifier 5023efc64069972f6ea97b33887e710d69627bebafbbb43f377db1155eb6196dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$2,724,048

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
OSEL, INC.
Proposal award date
2014-08-07
Contract end date
2016-07-31
UEI
R5DDHN86ANH9
Solicitation number
PA13-088
Topic code
NIAID

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION Women bear the brunt of the global AIDS epidemic due in part to their inherent social and biological vulnerability Biologically the cervical and vaginal mucosae are vulnerable targets for HIV transmission In healthy women of childbearing age mucosal antibodies and microbiota including Lactobacillus jensenii help protect these surfaces and serve to block the colonization and infection by intruding pathogens Epidemiological studies suggest that the loss of vaginal lactobacilli is associated with an increased risk of heterosexual HIV transmission and other sexually transmitted infections Osel Inc has used the properties of these natural protective agents by engineering a native human vaginal Lactobacillus L jensenii to express potent and broadly neutralizing single domain antibodies directed against HIV termed MucoCept Ab Osel recently showed proof of concept for this recombinant Lactobacillus approach by expressing an HIV entry inhibitor mCV N from L jensenii which reduced SHIV virus transmission in macaques by Lagenaur et al Mucosal Immunol Jul Phase II studies will advance MucoCept Ab through preclinical development These studies will focus on developing a safe efficacious and stable MucoCept Ab product and will include strain optimization formulation process development manufacturing preclinical safety testing and efficacy testing in a nonhuman primate NHP viral challenge model The goal of this Phase II is to develop a Lactobacillus strain capable of delivering an antibody locally to prevent HIV infection at the vaginal or rectal mucosa This strain will be formulated into a cost effective product capable of persistent protection that is coitally independent and controlled by women Aim MucoCept Ab API optimization and characterization A Complete MucoCept Ab strain optimization maximize promoter strength optimize codons for L jensenii remove epitope tag and test two genomic integration sites B Complete microbiological characterization of the MucoCept Ab strain genetic stability sequence chromosomal insertion site of expression cassette biochemical profiling antibiotic susceptibility resistant profiling AP m expressio levels C Establish ability of the MucoCept Ab strain to vaginally colonize female rhesus macaques Aim MucoCept Ab method development A Develop antibodies and ELISA to detect and measure AP m levels B Develop qPCR assay to measure levels of the MucoCept Ab strain Aim MucoCept Ab formulation process development and manufacturing A Develop formulation and lyophilization process for production of a stable MucoCept Ab product B Transfer MucoCept Ab strain and technology to GMP manufacturer for production of MCB and WCB scale up process development and production of MucoCept Ab for preclinical safety studies Aim MucoCept Ab preclinical safety and efficacy A Evaluate acute toxicity and systemic exposure of the MucoCept Ab strain and purified AP m protein following vaginal administration in mice B Evaluate acute toxicity of formulated MucoCept Ab in the rabbit vaginal irritation model C Evaluate subchronic toxicity vaginal colonization and AP m levels following vaginal administration of the MucoCept Ab product in female rhesus macaques D Evaluate efficacy of the MucoCept Ab product in female rhesus macaques using a repeated vaginal SHIV challenge protocol If successful this approach could provide a safe yet inexpensive means to deliver passive immunity against HIV to the vaginal mucosa and to address the urgent need for female controlled approaches to prevent sexually transmitted viral infection PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE We are harnessing the vaginal microbiota to develop a fundamentally new female controlled and coital independent HIV preventative Technologies have been developed to bioengineer a human vaginal Lactobacillus strain to express a potent single domain antibody against HIV creating a live self renewing microbicide that can be formulated as a novel fast dissolving vaginal tablet This product is mechanistically different from other microbicides and has the potential to greatly impact global HIV AIDS acquisition in women of childbearing age

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2025). Reported award amounts total $5,977,378. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.