SBIR/STTR Research Award

An Adaptive-Configuration Control System for Aircraft Thermal and Energy Management System

Award identifier 27a878829782a5f1c474279fba79ced63b807f3d97472144858d67dc9bed09c7Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$748,394

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CREARE LLC
Proposal award date
2014-07-24
Contract end date
2016-10-18
UEI
JDKYAKDT4TT6
Solicitation number
2013.1
Topic code
AF131-165

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Hybrid technologies and adaptive resource management can significantly enhance the capability and range of next-generation aircraft. To implement this strategy, we propose to develop a control system to configure the Adaptive Power and Thermal Management System (APTMS) based on the subsequent flight profile to enable the APTMS to use the most appropriate cooling system(s), heat sink(s), and energy source(s) to maximize the aircraft capability while minimizing fuel consumption. Based on the planned flight profile, the control system employs reduced-order physical models to forecast the performance of the APTMS with a given configuration. Based on the predicted performance, the system will then optimize the configurations for the remaining flight periods to maximize performance objectives. In Phase I, we devised an advanced optimization algorithm, developed a simplified model for the APTMS, implemented an integrated APTMS configuration optimization software package, and demonstrated its ability to identify optimal configurations of the APTMS during a flight to reduce the APTMS operation fuel penalty. In Phase II we will build and validate the APTMS optimization software with detailed physical models, use the software to identify the optimal thermal architecture for the APTMS and deliver the optimization software to the Air Force for further evaluation and development. BENEFIT: The proposed control system will enable future aircraft to fully realize the performance benefits of adaptive energy and thermal management, and enhance the capability and range of aircraft. In the near term, the control system will support the demonstration of the Integrated Vehicle Energy Technology (INVENT) program at the Air Force. In the long term, the control system will significantly enhance the static and dynamic performance of aircraft thermal management systems while reducing the overall vehicle fuel consumption. Commercial applications include more electric aircraft, air-conditioning systems, and thermal management systems for electronics and computer systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,365 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $507,020,394. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.