SBIR/STTR Research Award

Modeling the Responsiveness of Sensitive Populations to Genotoxic Agents Using DNA Repair Inhibitors

Award identifier 12ac64dc0dcdb8c9d317234d26850967dbf06d779f43bef10e99747e7655e232Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$823,805

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Litron Laboratories Ltd
Proposal award date
2025-09-05
Contract end date
2027-08-31
UEI
LJH7LE9AUHL5
Solicitation number
PA24-245
Topic code
NIEHS

Research abstract

Project Summary It is well recognized that conventional toxicology assays exhibit two crucial deficiencies. First, the use of limited numbers of cell lines and laboratory animal models/strains does not provide information about the degree to which a particular chemical may exhibit highly variable potencies across exposed humans. Although studying very large numbers of cell lines and laboratory rodent models could theoretically address this issue, it is not a practical answer. There are simply too many legacy chemicals and new chemical substances being developed for this to represent a routine testing scheme. A second issue with the current schema is that it does not typically generate much information regarding the molecular mechanism(s) responsible for a toxic effect. Fortunately, in the area of genetic toxicology, a solution exists for both of these issues. Our innovative approach takes into account the fact that inter-subject differences in sensitivity to genotoxic agents is often driven by variable DNA repair capacity. Our solution is based on a single p53-competent human cell line (TK6). Whereas test chemical-exposed TK6 cells will be used to generate reference responses, we will model sensitive subpopulation responses by co-exposing cells to each test chemical in combination with a panel of small molecule DNA repair inhibitors. These inhibitors will be chosen to cover each of the major DNA repair pathways. This platform will simultaneously allow us to identify for further testing those chemicals that are most likely to exhibit the greatest variation in genotoxic potency across exposed humans, and also provide insights into genotoxic mechanism. Innovative aspects of our project include our use of an automated, multiplexed DNA damage assay to cover multiple biomarkers of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, and state-of-the-art benchmark dose software to characterize the family of dose-response relationships that will be generated for each chemical studied. Once reduced to practice, we will make the assay available through fee-for-service chemical testing, with an eventual goal of selling reagent-containing kits.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

42 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2025). Reported award amounts total $18,400,554. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.