SBIR/STTR Research Award

Miniature High Performance Atomic Clock for Space Applications

Award identifier ef14d61ae1582fccbf93ed5ea1bc7447c386a5081ed8b53dee8afef0bda95d1bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
OEWAVES, INC
Proposal award date
2014-06-18
Contract end date
2015-03-30
UEI
L6MEAK541NH5
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF141-110

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become an essential part of military, and numerous civilian, systems. It is widely used in diverse applications, including timekeeping and position location. Despite its success and usefulness, the present GPS system is not capable of fully satisfying the emerging needs of future military and civilian applications, owing to emergence of advanced technologies and architectures. For these advanced applications, improved timekeeping and position location capabilities must be developed. In particular, the key to improved capabilities is high performance, compact precision atomic clocks (CPAC) with long-term stability of 1 x 10-16. Recent advances in atomic clock technology, based on the use of optical transition in atomic species has indeed led to demonstration of remarkable performance at 10-18 stability level. This level of stability more than meets the future needs of GPS, but unfortunately has been realized only in advanced metrological laboratories. The size, volume, and power requirements of these advanced clocks are far beyond the constraints imposed by capacity of GPS vehicles. Furthermore, the underlying technologies require advanced equipment such as high performance lasers at wavelengths that are beyond the reach of commercial availability. It is clear that a suitable clock capable of reliable operation in space vehicles must be based on a radically new approach. BENEFIT: OEwaves has a successful history in transitioning results of R & D and bringing products to the marketplace. The need for miniature optical clocks, based on the ultra-stable microresonator developed during current effort, with small power consumption and inexpensive packages extends beyond fundamental science. The clocks are desirable practically for any navigation platform. They also would improve secure communication capabilities. This broader academic and commercial market will increase the volume of the manufacturing base, supplying Government with commercial off-the-shelf products that meet their needs at lower unit cost. Potential customers include: Federal government (DoD, NASA, NOAA, NIST) Defense contractors Communications system vendors Academic laboratories Test equipment vendors

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

33 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2024). Reported award amounts total $12,500,629. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.