SBIR/STTR Research Award

Multiple-stage activated-char filtration

Award identifier 15b89e0e8618becb5e88e914aca8bf78a658ccccd4619086688ac7ea3092cf6eAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,868

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Advanced Renewable Technology International Inc
Proposal award date
2014-06-09
Contract end date
2015-03-08
UEI
WZVURCKZNJM5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001046
Topic code
02c

Research abstract

Less than 1% of the worlds water is considered freshwater. Population growth and intensive use in cities and agro industrial activities threatens the depletion of this resource in many parts of the world. This depletion poses many major social and economic concerns. As a result, efforts have been made to develop economically viable technologies to make potable water from seawater or brackish water resources. Today, 40% of desalination is accomplished through Reverse Osmosis (RO) technology (Greenlee, 2009). While RO has proven to be an effective technology, almost 40% of the operating costs involved in the process are energy-related (SNL, 2003). A multi stage activated char filtration with Capacity Deionization (CDI) technology is herein proposed as a novel approach for water filtration. The removal of organic and inorganic compounds can be achieved in a series of activated char modules to selectively remove contaminants in a more inexpensive and environmentally friendly manner. By using electric energy on a porous media (e.g. activated char), ions from salt can be retained. Thus activated char and CDI can produce fresh water while potentially using significantly less energy than RO (Porada, 2013). Biochar produced through the pyrolysis technology can enhance the adsorption of anions, cations or remove organic molecules (in similar fashion to activated carbon). Coupling this technology with the use of CDI in an electrode configuration will enhance the adsorption of smaller and more challenging ions. The pyrolysis process can be tailored to produce biochar to match specific equirements for both cathode and anode electrode configurations. Successful use of biochar in the CDI process would not only reduce process production costs, but would also further enhance sustainability. Biochar is principally composed of structurally resilient carbon. It reduces CO2 emissions from the manufacturing process compared to traditional activated carbon due to its renewable precursor feedstock and the slow decay of its recalcitrant carbon structure. Current water desalination techniques require large energy inputs and high capital costs. Reverse osmosis is not suited for small scale applications and requires expensive energy recovery systems. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The use of multiple-stage activated char with capacitive deionization can provide important reductions in energy use for the desalination in small scale and remote water purification facilities. Compared to current membrane deionization technologies, this new technology includes significantly less infrastructure, capital costs and complexity for the development and operation.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.