SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of Iron Phosphate Wasteforms for Fission Products Waste Streams

Award identifier e15e528a941981d57ba305e2be8ec467a80b2d9b935ba2dd7c0797b8ee9666f2Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,978

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MO-SCI Corp.
Proposal award date
2014-06-09
Contract end date
2015-03-08
UEI
MJFMGBBB6EJ7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001046
Topic code
19g

Research abstract

Most liquid high-level nuclear waste is currently being immobilized to a solid form as a borosilicate glass by vitrification. However, many nuclear wastes have complex and diverse chemical compositions that reduce their compatibility with borosilicate glass. The current baseline spent nuclear fuel reprocess generates secondary waste streams that generally include large amounts of MoO3 and lanthanides that are poorly soluble in borosilicate glasses and thereby limit the waste loading. New waste forms as alternatives to borosilicate glass are being sought to increase the waste loading while retaining acceptable chemical durability and thus to decrease the total nuclear waste volume required for storage and disposal. The main goal of the proposed nine month, SBIR Phase I program is to develop suitable iron phosphate-based compositions for vitrifying the MoO3-rich waste generated from reprocessed spent nuclear fuel with greater waste loadings than can presently be achieved with borosilicate glass and while retaining chemical durability that meets or exceeds appropriate DOE standards. Our previous studies have already demonstrated proof-of- concept for molybdenum solubility in an iron phosphate glass. During the Phase I program, we will formulate iron phosphate compositions to develop advanced waste forms, which can contain larger amounts ( & gt;40 wt%) of the MoO3-rich waste, compared to a borosilicate glass, while demonstrating (1) a good glass forming tendency, (2) moderate/practical melting and forming temperatures ( & lt;1200C), and (3) acceptable waste form properties, especially a chemical durability meeting the Product Consistency Test (PCT) requirements. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The proposed research will demonstrate that iron phosphate waste forms will increase radioactivity concentrations that can be safely stored and thereby decrease the total nuclear waste volume for storage and disposal. This would lead to considerable savings of time and money for the Nations effort related to nuclear waste remediation, something that is especially needed for the advanced domestic fuel cycle program.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

33 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2018). Reported award amounts total $6,181,304. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.