SBIR/STTR Research Award

Continuum Crack Gauge for Hot-Spot SHM

Award identifier 80f5bd3c1fab8fbe2393e36d6e90b922dc68066333c33e918b2e6dfd4a816b4cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
METIS DESIGN CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2014-06-06
Contract end date
2015-03-09
UEI
CKDFRHKKRNY3
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF141-065

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: MIL-HDBK-1530C to dictate how to maintain USAF aircraft through the Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP), which uses damage tolerant analysis (DTA) to set inspection intervals. While effective and safe, DTA can also be quite conservative, leading to excessive down-time for depot transit, tear-down, manual inspection, re-assembly, and return to fleet. In the interest of increasing fleet readiness, introducing condition-based maintenance (CBM) to strategic aircraft location could greatly promote asset availability. To deploy CBM, structural health monitoring (SHM) sensors are permanently integrated within aircraft to frequently/continuously indicate integrity of components, rather than relying on predictive models based on assumed loading profiles to dictate inspection intervals. While more complex SHM methodologies have been demonstrated with various levels of maturity, great benefit could be realized by extremely simple"fuse-style"sensors, which have the advantage of being easier to interpret data and potentially more straightforward to qualify according to MIL-STD-1823A. In its simplest embodiment, a fuse-style sensor is binary; a crack has grown or not grown. Generally, the more"rungs"introduced to the sensor, the more detail that can be provided about the crack. The proposed technology employs carbon nanotube sensors, providing a continuum of crack gauge elements for determining crack length and orientation. BENEFIT: Once successfully demonstrated through a Phase II effort, there exists a broad commercial market for this SHM method. One of the key success factors for this technology is its versatility; the ability not only to be integrated into new applications, but to be retrofitted into an existing asset designs. Initial relevant markets would include DoD fixed-wing aircraft, but the technology could easily proliferate into any DoD asset, ranging from rotorcraft to ships and ground vehicles, to aid in condition based maintenance. Once demonstrated in defense applications, comparable commercial opportunities exist, particularly for aircraft and potentially buildings and civil infrastructure once the production cost has been driven low enough. MDC will work through strategic partners to license the technology for production and deployment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

64 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $32,532,312. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.