SBIR/STTR Research Award

Access Language Arts

Award identifier 72d89140da72d1c8ad036eb28162d58fb331fb33e4385d7b63236624e5717355Awarding agency Department of Education

Award amount

$899,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Education
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ATTAINMENT CO., INC.
Proposal award date
2014-05-07
Contract end date
2016-05-06
UEI
K6BJMSZPJ9K7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Purpose: Instruction in English Language Arts (ELA) for students with severe intellectual disabilities and autism can be challenging, as these students often do not have the skills to engage with text. In recent years, special education experts have proposed a comprehensive approach to supporting students with intellectual disabilities and autism in ELA, centered on strategies including word identification, vocabulary development, comprehension, fluency, writing, and research, and by providing opportunities to independently read and explore a wide array of self-selected texts. This project will develop tablet-based and app technology that provides age-appropriate content and a variety of evidence based strategies to support middle school students with severe disabilities in meeting Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts. Project Activities: In 2013 during Phase I, a prototype app was developed and tested. The app included simplified versions of researcher-developed content whereby middle school students with cognitive disabilities listened to grade aligned nonfiction stories read-aloud, while individual words were highlighted on the tablet. These stories also included symbol supports, vocabulary instruction with in-text definitions, and comprehension questions. At the end of Phase I, pilot research with 3 students and 2 teachers demonstrated usability as the app operated as intended, and initial feasibility as the teachers were able to integrate the tool within standard practice and students found the app to be engaging. Phase II will add additional components to the existing prototype, including: adaptive instruction to adjust to individual student differences, formative data feedback to guide individualized instruction, additional stories, and additional skills in research and writing. During Phase II, the research partners at East Tennessee State University will carry out an iterative investigative process by implementing 3 studies to explore the usability and feasibility, fidelity of implementation, and the promise of the app to improve a variety of ELA skills. In Year 2, the fourth study will be a randomized control study with approximately 30 students, half of whom will be randomly selected for intervention. Students in the control group will be provided with the intervention at the end of the study. Analyses will compare pre- and post-test ELA scores.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2011–2021). Reported award amounts total $3,750,078. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Education, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Education

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.