SBIR/STTR Research Award

Molecular Modeling Driven Design of High Density Energetic Materials

Award identifier 1154a0467de6f4b29e556353903ad31f47218304a7f0012cf151f44ab9db76b2Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$485,798

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2014-03-10
Contract end date
2015-09-10
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
2012.A
Topic code
N12A-T023

Research abstract

Development of next generation energetic materials has been slow primarily due to a lack of fundamental understanding of the physics and chemistry of these materials. The strategy for development historically has been a trial-and-error experimental approach which possesses considerable risk of failure. With the advent of high speed computers and sophisticated molecular modeling techniques, it is now possible to predict properties of energetic materials prior to experiments. Therefore, a coordinated effort between molecular modelers and synthetic organic chemists is the key to fast development of energetic materials to meet today"s military combat requirements. In Phase I, CFDRC, in collaboration with synthetic organic chemist of University of Idaho, have conceptualized a number of energetic compounds, evaluated them with a range of molecular modeling methods for down selection, and attempted to synthesize two candidates. Phase II will continue the protocols followed in Phase I and expand its scope. A number of compounds of a certain class will be further evaluated, down-selected, synthesized and characterized. A plan for scale up of the most promising compound, its detonation testing and transition to Navy"s programs is also included. Development of next generation energetic materials has been slow primarily due to a lack of fundamental understanding of the physics and chemistry of these materials. The strategy for development historically has been a trial-and-error experimental approach which possesses considerable risk of failure. With the advent of high speed computers and sophisticated molecular modeling techniques, it is now possible to predict properties of energetic materials prior to experiments. Therefore, a coordinated effort between molecular modelers and synthetic organic chemists is the key to fast development of energetic materials to meet today"s military combat requirements. In Phase I, CFDRC, in collaboration with synthetic organic chemist of University of Idaho, have conceptualized a number of energetic compounds, evaluated them with a range of molecular modeling methods for down selection, and attempted to synthesize two candidates. Phase II will continue the protocols followed in Phase I and expand its scope. A number of compounds of a certain class will be further evaluated, down-selected, synthesized and characterized. A plan for scale up of the most promising compound, its detonation testing and transition to Navy"s programs is also included.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.