SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid isotopic analysis using heterodyne laser induced breakdown spectroscopy

Award identifier edb0ce274a646be760e5e437e054e212524c60165854baaa30f79755d69cbec5Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MESA PHOTONICS LLC
Proposal award date
2014-02-18
Contract end date
2014-11-17
UEI
H95KRYDC6D54
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000969
Topic code
24a

Research abstract

Isotopic analysis of suspect materials is an effective tool for identifying and characterizing nuclear. Isotope ratios of uranium, plutonium, lithium, and hydrogen are particularly informative for distinguishing fuel for nuclear power plants from weapons-grade material. Existing instrumentation capable of measuring isotope ratios to high precision and accuracy is expensive, bulky, and requires time-consuming sample preparation. Ideal replacements would not only allow rapid measurements, but would be compact and portable for field work. Mesa Photonics proposes an improvement to laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) that achieves the high spectral resolution needed for isotope ratio determinations in a small, lightweight, package that can be added easily to existing LIBS instruments. This approach takes advantage of LIBS strengths simple, fast sample preparation and analysis, able to work with samples at atmospheric pressure, and operation without consumable supplies while solving known LIBS problems that include poor spectral resolution, calibration problems due to matrix effects, and limited dynamic range. In Phase I, the proposed technique will be tested by measuring 85Rb/87Rb isotope ratios in natural abundance rubidium carbonate and in mixtures of the isotopically pure (99+%) carbonates. LIBS results will be tested against isotope analysis by a commercial laboratory using laser ablation, inductively coupled plasma, mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Rubidium was chosen for Phase I because the isotopic splitting is only 10 pm at 780 nm and requires better capabilities than are needed for determining isotope ratios of uranium, plutonium, lithium, or hydrogen. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Commercial analyzers will be person-portable devices costing $60,000 to $90,000 depending on laser power and number of simultaneous isotope ratio measurements that will have capabilities comparable to LA-ICP-MS instruments costing between $200,000 and $400,000. The primary market niche is field measurements for nuclear forensics. Additional markets include elemental and isotopic analysis for geochemistry.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

70 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2008–2025). Reported award amounts total $32,353,597. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.