SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Multi-Contact, Low Capacitance HPGe Detector for High Rate Gamma Spectroscopy

Award identifier 1ee6dbc1fcb9cddfb319e912f3ccb3f268d7843828c580df41e74249a6f7277dAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
XIA LLC
Proposal award date
2014-02-18
Contract end date
2014-11-17
UEI
J26GQK3R6773
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000969
Topic code
23a

Research abstract

The detection and identification of special nuclear materials and nuclear fission by-products is a critically important activity in support of nuclear non-proliferation programs. Gamma-ray spectroscopy is a key tool in this field, but no instrument exists that exploits the intrinsically high energy resolution and detection sensitivity of high purity germanium (HPGe) detectors while operating at high output count rates in the few 100 kcps to 1 Mcps range. The proposed work overcomes the high count-rate technical constraints of standard (high-capacitance) HPGe gamma-ray detectors by developing a multi-contact device with signal electrodes of a few pF capacitance. The technical approach combines the high electric field strength and intrinsically fast rise times of a planar detector with the collection efficiency of a coaxial device. Phase I will employ an electrostatic modeling program to investigate different multi-contact configurations on a 15 mm thick planar HPGe detector to calculate electrode capacitance and charge drift times, and to create a design that optimizes the geometry, contact width and spacing to meet or exceed the required specifications. The efficacy of the charge collection and capacitance model will be checked against measurements on an existing segmented HPGe planar detector. To gain sufficient collection efficiency for gamma-rays in the MeV range, the final detector design will use two back-to-back planar detectors. A second task in Phase I will be to design the detector housing, HPGe crystal mounts and internal connections, and explore options for the FETs and preamplifiers. An analysis of the electronic noise and the detection efficiency at 662 keV will also be made. Phase I will culminate with the design of the complete detector assembly and housing to be fabricated and tested in Phase II. We are in discussions with the leading segmented HPGe detector manufacturer for fabrication and eventual commercialization of the multi-contact detector. When combined with high rate multi-channel spectroscopy electronics, it is expected that the detector system will provide data throughput rates around 300 kcps per channel (at about 1 Mcps input) with electronic noise in the 500-600 eV FWHM range. This will present a significant advance for nuclear safeguards instrumentation with increased speed and accuracy of detection and identification in high count rate applications. As a unique tool for high rate and high resolution gamma spectroscopy, other applications are foreseen in areas such as medical imaging, and materials defect analysis by positron emission spectroscopy.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.