SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Practical On-Machine Inspection Equipment (PROMISE) for Metal Deposition Processes

Award identifier a83f81a37e5a1384e9d4d0792acc51eee4648053b0169d754c05ecc7407f4d7eAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
PRODUCT INNOVATION AND ENGINEERING LLC
Proposal award date
2014-01-01
Contract end date
2014-12-31
UEI
M5D7TUXBKGQ7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
NM

Research abstract

This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project will research and develop an innovative Practical On-Machine Inspection Equipment (PROMISE) for metal deposition processes. PROMISE will be a cost-effective and robust in-situ inspection system for direct metal deposition processes. Direct metal deposition processes are a very promising technology to rapidly fabricate or repair fully dense metal parts. These processes use a high power energy source to deposit metal materials layer by layer. The objective of this Phase I research project is to explore the feasibility of developing PROMISE to cost-effectively conduct in-situ inspection for the deposition of each layer so that immediate action can be carried out before the subsequent layer is deposited. The PROMISE enabling technologies include a cost-effective melt pool sensor, melt pool modeling, and innovative sensor system design. With proper processing and control of the sensor data, melt pool conditions can be effectively captured. With advanced melt pool modeling, we can fully understand the thermal behavior of laser-material interactions. Through integration with our path planning system, we can have a complete and a robust sensor system. The broader impact/commercial potential of this project will lead to dramatic improvement in part consistency and robustness due to process monitoring and control, thus greatly reducing process certification efforts. Insufficient automation in the in-situ inspection process is the biggest hurdle in achieving robustness and consistency in part quality. This quality issue is detrimental as a defect in the middle section of the deposition will spoil the entire part due to high performance requirements. This proposed technology will greatly reduce the operational complexity of metal deposition machines which will lessen the skill required for operators. This proposed project will then greatly broaden the scope of metal deposition applications and provide a significant impact to the design and manufacturing society. This technology can be used for many rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing processes, as well as mold and die repair, and other manufacturing processes involving a high energy source, such as welding, cladding, plasma, thermal spray, ion beam techniques, etc.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2024). Reported award amounts total $11,740,588. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.