SBIR/STTR Research Award

OAML Modernization and Cyber Hardening -- 24-066

Award identifier f5346b652cb559e511705f63948fe1307635f9abe764460beee4eed0590d5438Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$2,934,371

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
METRON INCORPORATED
Proposal award date
2025-09-03
Contract end date
2028-09-03
UEI
EN78W198KUG7
Solicitation number
15.1
Topic code
N151-035

Research abstract

The US Navy’s Oceanographic and Atmospheric Master Library (OAML) serves as a crucial repository of physics models and METOC databases, built over more than fifty years of research and engineering contributions from various sectors, including academia, government labs, and industry. OAML is integral to operational products and national security R&D initiatives, with its high-quality output maintained through a formal change management process involving a diverse group of stakeholders, such as military personnel, program sponsors, researchers, and students. However, OAML faces significant challenges due to outdated software engineering practices, which hinder the rapid integration of its products into modern systems and create cybersecurity vulnerabilities. These limitations result in less effective tools for military personnel, ultimately increasing costs for taxpayers. Metron’s proposal for the Catapult Challenge aims to modernize OAML by implementing DevSecOps practices while fostering collaboration through early and continuous engagement with the community. Metron emphasizes that successful software development requires a blend of innovative science and engineering, modern DevSecOps practices, and active participation from end users and stakeholders. Given that any DevSecOps integration may face resistance, community engagement is prioritized to foster stakeholder buy-in. With extensive experience as both users and contributors to OAML, Metron has identified key pain points stemming from previous development practices. The technical approach includes leveraging Large Language Model (LLM) coding tools to expedite software engineering while ensuring that essential algorithmic details are preserved through expert input. Recognizing the extensive scope of OAML, Metron plans to address the most pressing issues first, focusing on "low hanging fruit" to foster confidence and support from the community. This strategy aims to create momentum for tackling more complex challenges in OAML and establishing a framework for future product submissions. By prioritizing these efforts, Metron seeks to deliver immediate and long-term value to the Navy.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

194 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $79,536,370. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.