SBIR/STTR Research Award

Interlaminar Mode I and Mode II Fracture Toughnesses in Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs)

Award identifier 354a656f80bfa6f9fecb4dc22fd5d26588247d6c99c40d4cbd2a894e9c07af39Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$79,950

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.
Proposal award date
2013-08-15
Contract end date
2014-03-15
UEI
DRAGFFDYMT53
Solicitation number
2013.A
Topic code
N13A-T008

Research abstract

Susceptibility to delamination is one of the major weaknesses of ceramic matrix composites (CMCs). Knowledge of the resistance of composite to interlaminar fracture is essential for life cycle prediction analyses of structural components. The current test method for Mode I-interlaminar fracture toughness, the double cantilevered beam (DCB), is not satisfactory for thin CMC specimens because the compliance of the cantilever arms yields a spurious energy release rate. For Mode II-interlaminar fracture toughness testing, the end notched flexure (ENF) test is the most popular, but this test is not a standardized test method as yet. CMC components are in heavy demand for parts subjected to high heat. However, elevated temperature creates more severe conditions for interlaminar fracture toughness testing. A need exists, therefore, for reliable Mode I- and Mode II-interlaminar fracture toughness test methods which are applicable to a wide range of CMC materials, allowing for quantification of Mode I and Mode II-fracture toughness and accounting for the effects due to complexity of ply architecture at room temperature and elevated temperature up to 1316C (2400F). We propose several alternative methods, and a means to evaluate them using finite element analysis and actual testing. We will refine and downselect the methods to standardize an efficient, accurate testing approach.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

82 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2015). Reported award amounts total $21,696,566. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.