SBIR/STTR Research Award

Alternate Faceplate Materials for Improving Image Intensifier Tube Performance

Award identifier 03242c91c9cd1f3d9545d75e9edf3a1879618721bae9a3b696cb47e173b16822Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,977

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SA PHOTONICS, LLC
Proposal award date
2013-07-01
Contract end date
2014-04-01
UEI
YNEBKYE8ZZN7
Solicitation number
2013.1
Topic code
AF131-112

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: The military is constantly looking to improve night vision goggle performance. There are many components to optimize but one that is often overlooked is faceplate. The faceplate serves both as a substrate for the photocathode as well as a method for sealing the tube for high vacuum. It is usually made from Corning 7056 glass, of a thickness great enough to reduce halo due to reflected photons from the photocathode. We have verified that by increasing the index of refraction on the faceplate and by allowing it to be curved, significant performance gain is possible. In addition to a desire to improve performance of these tubes also comes a desire to help protect them from laser damage on the battlefield. An optical limiter that could be incorporated into the faceplate of the tube (to take advantage of the high flux densities near the image plane) would be very beneficial. A variety of new glass types have become available that may prove to have advantages when used in image intensifier tube (IIT) faceplates. High index glasses and chalcogenide glasses have promise to improve performance and we have also evaluated using glass with a curved front surface. BENEFIT: There are multiple benefits to the military in improving image intensifier tube performance via alternate faceplate materials. These benefits include: Protection against battlefield laser damage. By using alternative glass types and leveraging AFRL research, we can provide an optical limiter capability to night vision goggles to prevent them from being damaged by battlefield lasers. Improved resolution and MTF via higher index optical glasses and a redesign of the objective lens assembly. This will allow users to see smaller targets with higher contrast. Improved (reduced) f/#, which increases the amount of signal and the SNR. This will reduce the noise in the image and allow users to see targets under lower levels of illumination. Better filtering of off-axis light to reduce veiling glare in NVGs due to cockpit displays.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

265 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2022). Reported award amounts total $116,820,259. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

CACI PHOTONICS, LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.