SBIR/STTR Research Award

Innovative Methodology for Analytical Model Validation&Generation of Composite Structure Allowables

Award identifier 597aaa87502995b934bf6acb32204588e13f29bce698b144e64990324c98de42Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,992

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ADVATECH PACIFIC, INC.
Proposal award date
2013-07-01
Contract end date
2014-04-01
UEI
T5XFCLW2BFC4
Solicitation number
2013.1
Topic code
AF131-118

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: The overarching objectives for this project are to develop a novel approach to Calibration, Verification, and Validation (CVV) of advanced, high-fidelity analytical models; and an validated analysis tool to predict material properties for new materials with a minimized set of tests. The primary objective for the proposed Phase I effort will be to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach. Advatech Pacific"s approach consists of two main components: (1) High Fidelity, Multi-Scale Analysis Tool, aligned, calibrated, verified, and validated with (2) a novel approach to Testing, which entails the use of existing test databases and new testing performed with augmented ASTM tests and bi-axial testing. The second function will be to generate new material characterization predictions using augmented ASTM test data with the analysis tool that is validated over the entire realm of the design space for which the tool is expected to be deployed using far fewer tests. Advatech will utilize a Design of Experiments (DOE) based methodology with existing test data augmented with new test data and additional parametric data from specifications and procedures. This approach will utilize, predictive analytics, uncertainty quantification, probabilistic methods, data mining, and variance-based sensitivity analysis. BENEFIT: Following the success of the Phase II prototype development effort, the design environment can be made available for initial deployment for evaluation and improvement. Involvement of initial users can be leveraged to accelerate the development and expansion of the capabilities of the tool in parallel with the Phase III effort. When brought to fruition in Phase II, the end result will be a calibrated and validated analytical design environment prototype that can be widely deployed among the dispersed engineering teams on any given program. It will be capable of generating material properties for new materials using a minimized test matrix. This initial set of configurations will allow engineering teams to investigate a wide range of new materials for their designs. The design environment developed in Phase II will be structured as a modular, multi-scale, and expandable tool. That will allow customers to integrate this tool within their existing analytical framework in a complementary manner. It will incorporate a fully parametric formulation for every aspect of the inputs and outputs of the 3D solid element, ply-by-ply FEA models that will allowing for encapsulation and automation of the entire set of analytical steps required to fully evaluate any given range of test configurations. This will also allow the user to capture every relevant detail that may have an effect on the evaluation. The Phase II test effort will provide a good foundation for determining a standardized methodology for calibrating and validating analytical models such that they can be trusted to yield accurate results over the entire segment of the design space that they are configured to evaluate. This approach will open up the entire feasible design space for use by the engineer. It will also allow for a significant reduction in the testing required to introduce a new material into new and existing designs.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

20 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2017). Reported award amounts total $4,991,041. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.