SBIR/STTR Research Award

STTR Phase I: Site specific delivery of cancer stem cells inhibitory peptides

Award identifier c0961e9dc8ed2ebb3829e738902eff9e8576ff11e0c82fff01f9cf767748951eAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$224,881

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Thermally Targeted Therapeutics, Incorporated
Proposal award date
2013-07-01
Contract end date
2014-06-30
UEI
T4ANDMTJ1JL3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
EB

Research abstract

This Small Business Research (SBIR) Phase I project tests the application of a thermally responsive biopolymer, simultaneously to deliver breast cancer therapy and to prevent disease recurrence. Encouraging responses to multimodal treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) are too often followed by more aggressive and resistant breast cancers, attributed to cancer stem cell survival and proliferation, as regulated by the oncogenic role of Notch signaling. This Phase 1 project seeks: (1) to achieve targeted reduction of breast tumor stem cells during treatment through externally triggered delivery of potent chemotherapeutics via Notch signaling pathway inhibitory peptides that are optimized to selectively accumulate within breast tumors, (2) to evaluate in an established, in vivo mouse model of breast cancer this approach?s capacity to reduce breast tumors and spare healthy tissue, and (3) to identify, in a subpopulation of treated animals, the presence or absence of tumor recurrence over 5 months. The broad, commercial impact of this project lies in its technological potential to deliver a therapeutic peptide that targets and inhibits cancer stem cells, thereby boosting prevention of and lowering likelihood for cancer recurrence. Success in the proposed experiments would further indicate that this technology can be modified to achieve the targeted delivery of other highly specific anti-cancer drug that are designed to target any solid tumor, increasing treatment specificity and efficacy, while reducing cytotoxicity in normal tissues. It would further indicate that the technology can be modified for other diseases requiring targeted delivery of therapeutics. Immediately, however, cancer recurrences arising from triple-negative breast cancer are a rapidly increasing clinical problem. They are associated with poor prognosis and limited systemic therapeutic options, diminish gains achieved through current standard of breast cancer care and weigh heavily on patients in remission and strategies of their treatment team. Success in the proposed in vivo studies of the biopolymer could lead to clinical translation, commercialization, and most importantly greater effectiveness in initial cancer regimens, with greatly lessened likelihood of recurrence, of broad clinical and health care significance and impact.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2009–2013). Reported award amounts total $364,256. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.