SBIR/STTR Research Award

Robust Emitter Classification Using A Scanning Receiver

Award identifier a146f5f58d2835081d24ffb5974e750fe154f08e46f2f601d490b01164676c00Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$79,966

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
VADUM INC
Proposal award date
2013-06-28
Contract end date
2013-12-28
UEI
V1NUDAVNFVK1
Solicitation number
2013.1
Topic code
N131-052

Research abstract

In this research effort, Vadum will evaluate multiple classification techniques to mitigate the effects of corrupted measurements from the new scanning receivers in the SLQ-32 electronic warfare suite. Vadum will create an Automated Optimization Environment (AOE) to train three advanced classification techniques using existing electronic intelligence (ELINT) databases; these techniques will be tested using corrupted radar emitter intercept measurements that are noisy, biased, and missing pulses. Vadum"s innovative AOE approach, which optimizes parameters of the classifiers, reduces risk by allowing a wide range of classification techniques to be quickly optimized and evaluated. Many classification candidate techniques exist, each with advantages and disadvantages; during Phase I Vadum will evaluate three renowned techniques and determine which of these best solves the problem presented in this SBIR topic. Classification techniques to be evaluated include: Neural Network (NN) (tried and true), Support Vector Machine (SVM) (currently best in class), and Random Forest (RaFo) (state of the art). NNs are known to be robust and generalize well when not over-trained. SVMs are optimal, in the sense of maximized decision boundary margin, when classes are linearly separable. RaFos have been shown to have similar classification performance to SVMs but with less computational complexity. The study performed in Phase I will answer the question of which classification technique minimizes the emitter candidate list in the presence of biased, noisy, and incomplete scanning receiver measurements.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

99 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2025). Reported award amounts total $56,793,558. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.