SBIR/STTR Research Award

Increasing Power Capture of Wave Energy Converters via Advanced control of the PowerTake-Off

Award identifier b8f718d7b05f51f2306520d1d3ca23264253442efac6ea1448ad5ddde7581bd8Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$148,832

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.
Proposal award date
2013-06-10
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
QMEHBTKWMQG3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000801
Topic code
09a

Research abstract

The increase in the ability of a wave energy converter (WEC) to capture energy from waves is critical to ensuring the viability and cost effectiveness of wave energy power devices. WECs absorb wave power by applying a back force to oppose the forces that waves exert on the system. The back force is implemented by the systems Power Takeoff and is typically chosen via a constant damping value (resistive control). However, researchers are investigating the opportunity to increase power capture with a back force that varies in response to individual waves (advanced control). Several advanced control algorithms have been recently proposed. Across these algorithms, the level of validation varies from highly idealized numerical studies to preliminary tank tests. The challenges of practical implementation have not been fully explored. OPT proposes an investigation of the leading advanced control algorithms to compare their implementation requirements and increase in power above the baseline of resistive control. In tank tests, OPT has previously demonstrated a power increase from one advanced algorithm. This experience highlighted practical considerations that must be addressed, such as the effect of system friction and inefficiency or errors in the algorithm inputs. In Phase I, OPT will develop a realistic numerical implementation of a leading advanced control algorithm for comparison to the baseline, resistive control in order to perform parameter studies. From the study results, the algorithms will be compared based on the following metrics: increase in power beyond the baseline, ease of implementation, and low implementation cost. In addition to the trade study, Phase I will produce a plan for a wave tank test using a scale model of an OPT PowerBuoy with a working Power Takeoff in Phase II. The proposed work evaluates promising new methods to increase the power captured in realistic conditions by Wave Energy Converters. As such, it addresses the central obstacle to the commercial development of wave power, the cost of electricity. Reduction in the costs associated with the build, deployment and maintenance will accelerate the commercialization of wave powered systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2022). Reported award amounts total $2,963,992. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.