SBIR/STTR Research Award

Self-Healing Shape Memory Polymer Coatings for Chemical/Biological Protective Clothing

Award identifier d34f2dd944c77f9ca8c2ea42655e9ee1362db2c13b723404c2c6cccbad61e03eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Office for Chemical and Biological Defense

Award amount

$99,963

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
Recipient company
ICET, INC
Proposal award date
2013-05-20
Contract end date
2013-11-19
UEI
JF7VN7UHFLM5
Solicitation number
2013.1
Topic code
CBD13-110

Research abstract

The ultimate goal is to develop coatings to self-seal or heal a textile material. Soldiers"personal safety is compromised when CB protective uniforms become torn. This project aims to achieve this objective by coating or laminating a shape memory elastomeric polymer composite thin film with CB protective and excellent self sealing capability to an existing soldier garment fabric material. The potential mechanisms of passive and active self repair are presented. The healing process is anticipated to be enhanced by the shape memory properties and the continuous release of novel nanosealing agents from the membrane. The materials are robust thermally and environmentally to undergo industrial processing and field use. The Phase I effort will develop and screen formulations comprising an innovative stabilized nanoparticles containing CBW agent neutralizers, uniformly dispersed in a moisture vapor breathable shape memory polymer (SMP) matrix. This will be followed by the fabrication of a proof-of concept SMP material incorporated with the further down selected stabilized nanoparticles eventually as a free membrane or coated onto to a fabric. The highly moisture breathable, tear resistant elastomeric SMP liner releases agents when torn or cut to form an instantaneous flexible but tough rubbery barrier nanocomposite thus allowing shape recovery and self-repair. The coated fabric will be tested and demonstrated for the key criteria of establishing the sealing mechanism and performance . The CWA simulant and actual agent permeation will be carried out by the proposing firm and an Army certified laboratory on both the intact and self-sealed materials. The outcomes/ deliverable are first time data on the proof of concept Phase I in situ self sealing mechanisms for an ultra thin CB protective liner material and delivery of representative samples of known compositions. The Phase I option will demonstrate the more detailed self-sealing performance and active barrier properties of the prototype liner material made from a small industrial pilot trial.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

41 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1991–2020). Reported award amounts total $7,675,180. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.