SBIR/STTR Research Award

Augmentor Stability

Award identifier c048f6f89aeecebdc6663f04976b422c6663f381536331de2195857f5afcf2fbAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,962

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
GLOYER-TAYLOR LABORATORIES INC
Proposal award date
2013-05-10
Contract end date
2014-02-09
UEI
RPLDKCP343S9
Solicitation number
2013.1
Topic code
AF131-181

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: As with all other combustion devices, the augmentors in high-performance gas turbine engines are at risk of combustion instability. While it is tempting to apply brute force CFD to address this problem, at best high fidelity CFD may reveal what happens but not why it happens. While thousands of high fidelity CFD runs could be used to generate empirical type trends, that path is impractical. Instead, it is imperative to understand the sources and root causes of instability if this serious technical issue is to be overcome. Doing so will dramatically reduce development risk and cost, while also allowing maximum performance. To achieve this insight into combustion instability, GTL has developed the Universal Combustion Device Stability (UCDS) process. UCDS is a physics-based model that employs a hybrid analytical-computational analysis wherein energy transport in and out of unsteady fields can be tracked. Doing so quantifies the sources of unsteady energy and their effect on the overall stability. A sophisticated set of computational tools are in place to facilitate this approach. Altogether, UCDS can predict instability, quantify sources of driving or damping, and provide a critical understanding of combustion instability in augmentors at a significantly reduced computational cost. BENEFIT: Combustion instability, whether it is in the form of low frequency rumble or high frequency screech is a serious risk (likelihood and severity) to propulsion system development programs. This instability is characterized by organized pressure oscillations that can severely damage engine hardware or structural damage limiting augmentor operability. To overcome this issue, developers have largely used a cut-and-try approach, which has proven to be costly and not always reliable. In contrast, the UCDS process provides clear insight into why the propulsion system behaves the way it does. This allows developers to design the issue out of their system early or quickly mitigate the issue if it arises during testing. This approach will greatly reduce development cost, schedule and risk, while also allowing performance to be improved. Since UCDS is built from a general formulation it can be applied to practically any combustion device, including augmentors, combustors, liquid rockets, solid rockets, ramjets and scramjets.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

70 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2008–2025). Reported award amounts total $27,804,610. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.