SBIR/STTR Research Award

Complete Muon Collider Cooling Channel Design and Simulations

Award identifier b2a1a68896d07259320e1b3df0eee95fc07ead2fe346c92c1eaac596b8315404Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MUPLUS INC.
Proposal award date
2013-04-09
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
GARLL9M5C245
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000782
Topic code
28b

Research abstract

Considerable progress has been made in developing promising subsystems for muon beam cooling channels to provide the great reduction of emittances required for an Energy-Frontier Muon Collider; but an end-to-end design is lacking. Meanwhile, the recent discovery of a Higgs-like boson has created interest in the high-energy physics community for a Higgs Factory to investigate whether its properties verify Standard Model predictions or represent new physics. This project is developing principles and tools to match beam phase space distributions between and within muon beam cooling subsystems that may have different characteristics. The Helical Cooling Channel (HCC), with combined helical dipole and solenoid fields, allows a general analytic approach to guide designs of transitions from one set of cooling channel parameters to another. These principles and tools are being applied to design complete cooling channels for a Higgs Factory and an Energy Frontier Muon Collider. Transverse and longitudinal phase space matching techniques were developed in Phase I and applied to previously designed segments that presented the greatest matching challenge. Simulation results demonstrated even better performance in half the length of the original! Theoretical considerations of space charge effects started. Improvements in the G4beamline simulation program and its use on FermiGrid facilitated the computations and associated successes. Studies of early segments in a particular promising cooling channel indicate a need to optimize its design further in Phase II. Armed with the demonstrated matching techniques and further enabled by the computing power of NERSC, where G4beamline will be installed, the entire cooling channel will be revisited and designed, considering space charge effects. Analytic fields used in the Phase I design work will be replaced by realistic fields generated by coil elements. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Our ulterior motive is to enable the DOE to hire US companies to construct Muon Colliders, the next multi-billion dollar scientific instruments to investigate the smallest things in the universe. The cold muon beams developed in the project also have important potential applications for homeland security, medicine, and other basic and applied scientific research.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2024). Reported award amounts total $2,849,857. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.