SBIR/STTR Research Award

Multicomponent Nanomanufactured Drop-in Lubricant Technology for Enhancing Engine Friction Reduction

Award identifier 66aa612c012769f4c76f71e1a8c46fb3029204a126637819ac8589891aae237cAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,962

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NanoMech, Inc.
Proposal award date
2013-02-19
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000715
Topic code
06h

Research abstract

The objective of this Phase I project is to demonstrate feasibility to design and develop novel nanomanufactured multicomponent lubricant additives applicable for engine, especially engineered as additive for enhancing engine economy with at least 3%. This economy will be enhanced through the power of nanosized multicomponent (multi-chemistry/macromolecular) lubricating agents launching into the intricate spaces between mating surfaces where they form a durable lubricating film that sustains high loads and reduces friction and wear (boundary lubrication regime). Completing this objective will involve systematic scientific investigation of the various complex chemical components that positively impact wear and friction behavior in engine environments and utilization of this knowledge to develop functional nanoparticle based additive compositions for lubricant systems. Based on attractive preliminary analysis at the University of Arkansas for investigating the effects of adding multi-chemistry nanolubricant into regular engine oil, 5.8% increase in power and a proportional increase of efficiency with the additive for single cylinder four stroke 6.5 HP gasoline engine, the project research team led by NanoMech will conduct Phase I feasibility scale laboratory-based tribological evaluation of nanolubricants. The analysis will be performed in order to study friction and wear characteristics using a table-top engine test-vehicle. Preliminary test data indicated a 20 30% reduction in the coefficient of friction (using fundamental ball- on-disk test configuration) when compared with a mineral base oil of similar viscosity as the baseline engine oil. In a separate study, wear test data indicated a 50% improvement in wear scar using industry specified test conditions (4 ball test, ASTM D 4172). Overall, in the Phase I, II, and III iteratively designed and optimized nanolubricant additive formulations will be evaluated using engine tests and field studies to demonstrate meeting engine performance efficiency (per DOE guideline), power gain, fuel economy, and environmental impact reduction. In Phase I, we intend to conduct key tests in cooperation with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL-DOE) and University of Arkansas. POTENTIAL partners and end users include Cummins, Wal-Mart, J.B. Hunt, and FedEx, and we plan to cement those relations in the Phase I of this project. The nanomanufacturing process for synthesizing these multi- component lubricants for engine application is scalable for commercial production and is a part of another major successful DOE funded Phase II effort, which is about to be completed.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.