SBIR/STTR Research Award

Nanostructured Catalysts for Alkaline PEM Fuel Cells

Award identifier 9a074dc23a24268160a2037c522758bcfcd2e55f6f2fb8b7721c0b7bcc2d4fbdAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,981

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
GINER INC
Proposal award date
2013-02-19
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ULB2NMDNXC69
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000760
Topic code
10 c

Research abstract

A major inhibitor in the adaptation of polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) has been the high levels of precious metal catalysts needed for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in state-of-the-art acid-based PEMs. Alkaline PEMs have long held the promise of lowering the need for precious metal catalysts due to acceptable levels of ORR kinetics on non-precious metals. Adaptation of alkaline PEMs has been slow due to low carbon dioxide tolerance, poor membrane chemi- cal stability, poor hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) kinetics and poor ionomer electrode interface. A nano-structured novel support for alkaline PEM catalyst layers will be developed. The support will eliminate the difficulties of the catalyst ionomer interface encountered in making alkaline PEM membrane electrode assemblies. This can greatly increase catalyst utilization and improve alkaline PEM ORR and HOR kinetics. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: PEM fuel cells have long held the promise of efficient energy for back-up power, transportation, and when coupled with an electrolyzer; energy storage for load leveling of renewable energy. In each of these applications fuel cells have the potential to greatly increase efficiency, reducing the amount of energy needed, while greatly lowering CO2 output. To date nearly all of the technology focus has been on acid-based PEMs. As the technology has matured the PGM catalyst costs have become an ever increasing fraction of the total system cost, and continue to be prohibitive. No non-PGM has come close to the performance needed in these applications for the oxygen reduction reaction. One of the only ways known to break through this barrier is to switch from an acidic to an alkaline environment where oxygen reduction kinetics are greatly enhanced. Developing a catalyst layer structure that can take advantage of these kinetics has been challenging. If this technology were to prove successful it would allow the utilization of PEM fuel cells in the aforementioned applications, greatly lowering our nations energy requirement while lowering our carbon emissions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

447 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $147,003,828. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.