SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of an In-Situ Method for Cable Condition Monitoring in Nuclear Power Plants

Award identifier 4e2b01911a8d8612c65615cbb8fae69183fd2f326e18474099053eb409e38a43Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,776

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ANALYSIS AND MEASUREMENT SERVICES CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2013-02-19
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
HWG4CG5VK931
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000760
Topic code
14 c

Research abstract

In the U.S., almost all the 104 operating commercial nuclear power plants have applied or plan to apply for license renewal, many of which have recently received approval. This has given rise to questions about the aging of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that are important to plant safety and longevity. Recently, many national laboratories and agencies, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, have identified the aging of cable insulation materials (i.e. polymers) as an important issue to the safe operation of a plant. Although individual cables can be replaced, a wholesale replacement is cost-prohibitive and not a practical aging management strategy. As a response to this need, plants will begin to implement cable aging management programs to assess the health and performance of cables, especially those used for safety-related applications. However, currently available cable testing techniques are either destructive or focus primarily on the conductor. Of particular interest to the industry is a non-destructive method that offers in-situ testing capabilities to assess the aging condition of cable polymer materials. As such, the goal of this project is to adapt an in-situ electrical testing technique, known as Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR), for this application. The proposed Phase I project, AMS will evaluate the effectiveness of FDR to identify the aging condition of nuclear power plant cables. This will be accomplished through extensive laboratory testing involving thermal aging of polymer materials and a comparison of FDR results and Elongation at Break, the industry standard for health assessment of polymer materials. The result of the Phase I will be a prototype design of an FDR system, including both hardware and software, to be used in a cable aging management program. A Phase II project to be proposed later will develop a commercial FDR system for nuclear power plants. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Successful commercialization of this product will result in improved safety of nuclear power plants through accurate health and aging assessment of cable polymer materials. Applications include insulation degradation detection, hot spot detection, and conductor/connector problems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

69 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1984–2024). Reported award amounts total $30,985,297. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.