SBIR/STTR Research Award

Predicting Requirements for instructional Environment Design to Improve Critical Training (PREDICT)

Award identifier adc85db24c874ac3540997dbede82dd5442c97bc3978ddfb927544b67b2d1b38Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$298,166

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
APTIMA INC
Proposal award date
2012-09-21
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
K1GCPNNZKEN7
Solicitation number
2007.1
Topic code
N07-099

Research abstract

Phase II.5 proposal, extension of Phase II contract N00014-09-C-0079: Aircraft carrier landings are one of the most difficult and safety critical tasks Naval Aviators must master in the course of their training. In light of continuing training resource and budgetary constraints, there has been interest on the part of the USN to investigate the potential for increased flight simulator utilization for aircraft carrier landing training. In particular, there is initial interest in augmenting F-18 Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS) carrier qualification (CQ) training which accounts for the largest CQ training requirement. Current F-18 flight simulators do not support CQ training due to a lack of fidelity, particularly with regard to visual display capabilities and aircraft motion representation. In order to advance flight simulator capabilities such that they may support future CQ training, it will be necessary to investigate current simulator fidelity shortfalls and determine the necessary upgrades. In support of that objective the current effort proposes to: (1) develop objective measures of pilot performance during aircraft carrier landings; (2) design experiments to assess the impact of varying levels of simulator fidelity on pilot performance during aircraft carrier landings; and (3) to collect objective data to identify the appropriate level of simulator fidelity required for CQ training.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

520 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2025). Reported award amounts total $208,057,185. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Transportation, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.