SBIR/STTR Research Award

Commercialization of a Microscale, Point of Use Radiosynthesis Device for the Development and Production of PET Probes

Award identifier 599ec08bfef613519d001bdfea56d7a833001f52f736498320c3d13cf8a7cc99Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$995,467

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Sofie Biosciences, Inc.
Proposal award date
2012-08-08
Contract end date
2014-08-07
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000676
Topic code
33 a

Research abstract

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a molecular imaging modality that utilizes radiolabeled molecules (probes) to target and measure biological processes. Basic scientists can use the same probes to examine microorganisms, cells, and mice as they do in patients to visualize and characterize the biology of disease, monitor its progression, and evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Although over 1,600 PET probes have been developed to help answer a variety of biological questions, and could potentially lead to new diagnostic and therapeutic tools for further study, only the glucose analog 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) is routinely used. This limitation exists because of the centralized radiopharmacy approach to PET probe production, with its complexity, high infrastructure cost, and necessity of specialized equipment and skilled personnel. An alternative, decentralized approach to PET probe development is required to give scientists the freedom to determine what probes they want to use to best solve the problems of their interest. This goal can be achieved by building a benchtop, computer-controlled, microfluidic chip-based commercial device for the on-demand production of PET probes. Phase I of this project answered basic commercial feasibility questions about the underlying Electro- Wetting-On-Dielectric (EWOD) microfluidic chip technology, including: (1) the suitability of EWOD chips based on printed-circuit-board (PCB) technology to reduce costs of radiosynthesis chips; (2) the repeatability of synthesis process parameters and outcomes; (3) coupling of a miniature purification system to the prototype chip; and (4) establishing the versatility of the platform through synthesis of additional PET compounds other than [18F]FDG. Phase II will produce a commercial prototype platform for the point-of-use production of PET probes. This platform will include: (1) a computer-based control system; (2) an inexpensive, disposable, probe- specific cassette of chips and reagents; and (3) a compact, benchtop housing that serves to shield the end user from radiation. As an eventual product, a library of cassettes will be developed based on customer needs for different probes. Shifting to a point-of-research/point-of-care model is a transformational solution that circumvents the limitations imposed by the centralized model on probe production, cost, and diversity. By empowering scientists and clinicians to control the development and use of PET probes, they are able to focus on processes that they believe are most important for the environmental and biological sciences.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.