SBIR/STTR Research Award

Satellite Drag Physical Model Module for a Near Real Time Operation Test Bed

Award identifier 2f31f6aa74eea426fddf57714963db93c58be9856dc043e269eacc7fb1dee6caAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,999

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ATMOSPHERIC & SPACE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES LLC
Proposal award date
2012-07-10
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DRYZNRMCBKL6
Solicitation number
2011.B
Topic code
AF11-BT29

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Satellite drag is the leading cause of orbit prediction error in low earth orbit. Modeling of this drag force and its variability is critical to accurate orbit determination and prediction. One of the leading contributing factors to error in drag prediction is thermospheric neutral density variability. Operational models up until the present time have been empirical, with inputs including solar flux and geophysical indices. These empirical models fail to reproduce density variations, especially during periods of large solar flux and geomagnetic storms. Therefore, in order to provide better orbit determination, we propose to develop a physics-based model, which will predict thermospheric density variations and the associated satellite drag in real time. Work to be done in Phase-I includes demonstration of realtime operation, development of appropriate validation metrics, validation exercises, and comparison of TIME-GCM and CTIPe in order to determine strengths and weaknesses of each. We will also validate the use of the AMIE procedure in order to better specify high-latitude inputs. Finally, we will relate the model density errors to expected drag errors. Phase-I buys down risk in preparation for a modeling framework for real time prediction of thermospheric density variability. BENEFIT: Phase-I will buy down risk for the development of a physical model for satellite drag applications, with an accuracy and capability equivalent to the current empirical model, JB-08. The proposed work will lead to the development of innovative algorithms based on near real-time space weather data and geophysical indices. These algorithms will improve upon the current thermospheric density specification models, and will eventually lead to improved 3-day satellite drag forecast capabilities. The anticipated impact of the proposed work is to buy down the risk of developing a physics-based model that can be run in a real time assimilative mode to aid in accurate satellite orbit prediction. The resulting tools will be used by the Air Force for risk-mitigation exercises, including the reduction of the prediction errors of satellite positions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

56 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2023). Reported award amounts total $18,884,787. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.