SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Chemically Impregnated Nanoparticles for Use in Copper Chemical Mechanical Planarization Slurry

Award identifier 64c65986d637892ade741baeef9eb69ab747f0496f0b356265c8ca72c7eeaa8cAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
GENERAL ENGINEERING & RESEARCH, L.L.C.
Proposal award date
2012-07-01
Contract end date
2012-12-31
UEI
GKKUTN2NGXJ5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
NM

Research abstract

This Small Business Innovation Research Phase I project is focused on the development of a copper chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) slurry containing chemically impregnated nanoparticles. The CMP process consists of a polishing pad and an aqueous slurry containing chemicals and abrasive nanoparticles. The wafer surface to be planarized is rotated against the polishing pad which is continuously supplied with slurry. The synergistic combination of mechanical abrasion and chemical etching creates high material removal rates (MRR) and rapid planarization. Currently, copper CMP slurry solutions require a complexing agent, such as glycine, to maintain an adequate MRR, which at the same time, also causes static etching and dissolution (i.e. corrosion) of the wafer surface which is difficult to control. If the exposure of the complexing agent to the copper surface could be controlled so that only the abraded areas were affected, then static etching and dissolution could be reduced or eliminated. Therefore, the focus of this proposal is to significantly improve copper CMP slurry technology by combining the complexing agent into the abrasive nanoparticle, so that mechanical and chemical actions of the slurry are localized and simultaneous, thus improving processing efficiency and tolerances. The broader impact/commercial potential of this project includes advancing the state-of-the-art in CMP slurry formulation and opening the door for functionalized nanoparticles in the CMP slurry market. Specific impacts of the proposed project on copper CMP slurry technology include: increasing planarization efficiency (ratio of step height reduction and removed layer thickness) by decreasing static etching, eliminating a majority of the chemical additives that are currently required in copper CMP slurries, and reducing particle agglomeration by improving the dispersion stability. These advantages will ultimately lead to a reduction in the cost of CMP processing while also improving processing tolerances. Additionally, an enormous opportunity exists to exploit functionalized nanoparticles to improve CMP slurries. Successful implementation of this product will most certainly lead to derivative technologies for other CMP processes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2024). Reported award amounts total $3,731,765. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.