SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: GigaShield USB Security

Award identifier a2a859b922d1ceeabf7f904b39c606d2f8fd5626cb0fdeadddca593283c28a63Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Gigavation Incorporated
Proposal award date
2012-07-01
Contract end date
2012-12-31
UEI
EGD9S6U4JJE3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
EI

Research abstract

This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project will address the rapidly growing threats to endpoint security from attacks and data loss over Universal Serial Bus (USB). At present, virtually all USB security measures are located as software on the host or as a secured physical device. Neither of these approaches is truly capable of addressing the vulnerability as a whole - software solutions can be bypassed and a physical peripheral device cannot secure the data that is transmitted on the bus. The proposed technology is located external to the host, so it is capable of securing the entire bus. The specific technical objectives include the construction of a security device capable of stopping representative attacks in the USB threat model that are not solved by existing solutions. Such a device would enable a breakthrough improvement in the field of USB cybersecurity. The anticipated results for proposed research are to demonstrate that such a device can stop attacks and data loss without introducing prohibitive overhead. The broader impact/commercial potential of this project is understood by recognizing that it represents a disruptive change to USB security. USB security has become critical for many organizations, especially healthcare, financial, and defense institutions. The number of data loss incidents over USB has exploded with the availability of smart devices and tablets. USB attacks compromised Predator drones in 2011 using USB drives, and the Military has implemented USB bans, degrading productivity and increasing costs. Despite USB bans, attacks and data loss over USB continue due to workarounds and limitations of current solutions. The proposed technology will provide unprecedented levels of security to USB and a framework to build future security infrastructure. To stimulate continued innovations, the platform will be opened to the greater scientific and commercial community to develop the next generation of algorithms to stop attacks and data loss over USB. In addition, the device provides unparalleled access to USB data with a simple interface, so it can enable students and professionals to rapidly ramp up their understanding of USB without the currently necessary prerequisites of expensive hardware and proprietary software. The device can ultimately be integrated into computers, which would impact the security of every computer.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2019). Reported award amounts total $3,112,670. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.