SBIR/STTR Research Award

VALIDATED DESIGN MODEL OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONTOURED SANDWICH STRUCTURE FOR AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS

Award identifier fed762a48d39042d31d4f2a03e9534d1d5d32f60d72a9c81474d1e3da1da9e40Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$749,891

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
MATERIALS RESEARCH & DESIGN INC
Proposal award date
2012-05-21
Contract end date
2015-12-23
UEI
QU1NM7F1CDV4
Solicitation number
2010.2
Topic code
N10B-T050

Research abstract

Navy aircraft employ components that are contoured for aerodynamic performance and made of composite sandwich structures for high strength-to-weight ratio. Many of these components presently use honeycomb cores surrounded by thin high strength face sheets. While honeycomb is used extensively, it can be difficult to form to contoured shapes, must be spliced to reinforce high stress locations, provides limited bond area, and is prone to moisture absorption. Many of the limitations of standard honeycomb can be addressed with cores made from aerospace-grade foam reinforced with unidirectional graphite composite pins. These cores can be thermoformed to aerodynamic shapes, provide larger face sheet bond area, absorb less water, and can employ tailored pin distributions in high stress locations. Under separate Army funding MR&D had developed Technicore, a micromechanical design tool that allows a designer to specify core stiffnesses and strengths and define resulting foam and pin fabrication parameters. In the Phase I STTR, the team of Materials Research & Design (MR&D) and the University of Maryland (UMD) validated Technicore for flat cores by comparison with results provided by UMD including ASTM test data, detailed digital image correlation (DIC) measurements, and 3D finite element analysis. The goal of the Phase II STTR will be to extend and validate Technicore for contoured aircraft sandwich structure. The Phase II Base technical effort will consist of four tasks including: 1) extension of Technicore micromechanical theory to curved structures with variable pin orientations; 2) theoretical validation of Technicore by comparison to detailed 3D finite element models; 3) experimental validation of the design method by testing a contoured subcomponent, and; 4) transfer of the technology by software distribution and training for end users such as AEC, Boeing, Sikorsky, Bell, etc. The Phase I Base program will focus on structures with single curvature such as a cylindrical shell. The proposed Option program includes four additional tasks that will extend the theory and experiments to doubly curved structures like a spherical shell. The proposed Phase II will be coordinated with an ongoing program at Albany Engineered Composites (AEC) that is developing an X-cor tunnel cover for a CH47 helicopter.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

133 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $60,564,982. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.