SBIR/STTR Research Award

Spatially Controlled Opto-Fluidic Attenuator

Award identifier 5bd1092c059db3832e5eef40d5bb734770c6fbc182c83f4cb905368e9b0a4732Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,986

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
GLINT PHOTONICS, INC.
Proposal award date
2012-04-06
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LSC4N53H1PK1
Solicitation number
2012.1
Topic code
AF121-127

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Glint Photonics proposes to develop the Spatially Controlled Opto-Fluidic Attenuator (SCOFA), a new type of optical element that can addressably and selectively block incoming light over arbitrary areas. The SCOFA is an array of shutter pixels, each of which contains a small droplet of liquid metal. Electrowetting actuation is used to draw the metal droplet into a thin flat channel, spreading it out to form an opaque shutter that reflects incident light. When the bias is removed, interface tension causes the liquid metal to recoil back into a droplet shape, re-opening the light valve. Liquid metal is an attractive material for shutter applications because it offers complete blocking of broadband light sources in a very thin film. Electrowetting actuation is expected to provide a facile means of switching the light valves. Phase I research will evaluate different electrowetting approaches and explore pixel design geometries BENEFIT: The Spatially Controlled Opto-Fluidic Attenuator (SCOFA) is designed to improve the imaging capabilities of airborne and space-based camera sensors in sun-facing orientations or high-glare situations. Optical sensors have a limited dynamic range, so the presence of bright sources in the field of view can prevent the sensor from resolving other, dimmer, elements in the scene. By selectively blocking out the light from bright sources, the SCOFA will allow sensors to devote their full dynamic range to the remainder of the scene. The ability to provide high-quality data in these difficult imaging conditions would expand intelligence-gathering and targeting capabilities, allowing US forces to operate with greater speed, flexibility, and accuracy. Numerous other applications are also possible, in both military and civilian uses. Airborne imagers are increasing used by domestic law enforcement agencies, and also find application in agriculture, forestry, and other fields. Each of these applications could benefit from the SCOFA in order to provide better imagery in high-glare situations. At sufficiently low price-points, the SCOFA could even be integrated into consumer cameras to provide spatially-controlled glare-suppression or to replace costly and delicate mechanical shutters.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2011–2023). Reported award amounts total $9,306,896. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.