SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid Assembly, Energy Efficient Composite Shelter

Award identifier 7aba0b3c8d1407ee4a693da733fa2dfb3f6ecb9453cc973f1665cc46b2163ea7Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,991

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
COMPOSITE SUPPORT & SOLUTIONS, INC.
Proposal award date
2012-04-03
Contract end date
2014-04-01
UEI
KM9BSRRYM4P3
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-202

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Shelters can be considered as the logistical backbone of military operations. Therefore the 500 CBSS / GBLE - AF Tactical Shelters/Radomes/Towers Program Office has determined a need to research the potential and feasibility of developing an improved shelter design that meets the needs of systems and users across the DoD. Every branch of the armed services has countless millions worth of such mission critical shelter equipment in various configurations. To meet this need, CSSI is maturing a composite shelter design with modular panels which can be quickly swapped to accommodate configuration, mission, and/or system changes. Custom panels, developed to meet Force Protection needs such as ballistics and extreme thermal environments, can be inserted in the snap-together composite frame. This"Rapid Assembly"design will reduce the time required during base construction. CSSI has developed a sound and innovative approach to manufacture and build a prototype for a baseline non-expandable 20 foot ISO shelter. Special emphasis is on achieving and ISO-stacking qualification test as well as superior energy efficiency in harsh global climates. The benefits of this new shelter asset would ripple through the entire inventory of DoD assets. BENEFIT: The government sector has a need for the shelter asset and once it is fully developed and certified it could be stock-listed. Given the lower price than the current aluminum container at less than half the weight, there would be an incentive for the government buyer to select this asset. Its flexibility and ruggedness would ripple through the DoD inventory. Since the shelter is virtually maintenance-free important life-cycle savings will result because of greatly reduced maintenance costs, and eco-advantages such no as need to paint, no need for paint strippers, or to fight corrosion. DoD would also benefit from reduce energy costs since the all composite shelters would exceed energy/thermal efficiency. The transportation industry has an immediate need for shelters/ ISO containers which are lightweight and fit the logistics requirements. The benefits which could accrue are estimated in the $70M/ year range. Longer term benefits would accrue from the maritime ISO-container sales.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2015). Reported award amounts total $4,801,115. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.