SBIR/STTR Research Award

Forward Osmosis Water Purification Membranes for Small Operations

Award identifier bb37524f71be27be97fda6a02e997be87ce65d49dc5a49e0c2c131e171645992Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$80,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
T3 SCIENTIFIC LLC
Proposal award date
2012-03-01
Contract end date
2012-08-31
UEI
EL3LMT43XG38
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
A

Research abstract

This small Business Innovation Research Phase I project develops a high efficiency forward osmosis water purification membrane for small and remote operations. For remote areas where accessibility to water and electricity grid is not available or cost prohibitive, energy intensive water purification systems does not offer any relief. Other issues such as discharge, maintenance and residual handling further complicate the requirements. This sector is definitely underserved by current technologies. Current desalination technologies such as reverse osmosis require huge amounts of energy. Forward osmosis (FO), which harnesses the force of nature, emerges as one of the most efficient methods to desalinate water. This process can desalinate water for about half the cost of standard reverse osmosis (RO) desalination. With the help of waste heat, the const can reach 1/10. The proposed ultrathin FO membrane combines a defect free ultra thin membrane with a low resistance support to produce a high efficiency FO membrane. To ensure the success of this project, two objectives are laid out: 1) performance that matches the best reported FO membrane in salt rejection and water permeance; and 2) membrane stability for extended period. This membrane is expected to out-perform any existing and developmental FO membranes, enabling the use of energy efficient FO process for water desalination. This high performance, costs and energy efficient water purification membrane will enable the use of low-energy FO process for water desalination to provide water access to small and very small operation, especially for remote area. This technology require low capital, operational and maintenance cost, satisfies safety, handling, maintenance and discharges requirements for remote and small operations, thus enables water access to arid remote areas. Besides water desalination, the other two largest market segments for this technology are semiconductor manufacturing and pharmaceutical processing. The success of this technology will help to reduce worldwide water shortage, provide water to less privileged public, create competitive advantage for the U.S. in water related technologies and provide chain benefits to fields such as medical and military applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2012). Reported award amounts total $1,320,000. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.