SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-yield Production of Fumarate from Cellulosic Biomass by Recombinant Cellulolytic Bacillus subtilis

Award identifier e51450077679c3347cf4908ed840e86b1f2cdd119fdedd4760043e734845cafcAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$142,187

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Gate Fuels Incorporated
Proposal award date
2012-02-20
Contract end date
2012-11-19
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000577
Topic code
17 a

Research abstract

This project will provide a low-cost route for high-yield fumarate production from pretreated non-food cellulosic biomass mediated by recombinant cellulolytic Bacillus subtilis. The cellulose fraction of biomass feedstock contains more than one half oxygen by weight, making it a good starting material for the production of oxygen-containing polymeric monomers. Fumaric acid or fumarate, among the DOEs top building block chemicals is a precursor of succinic acid, malic acid, L-aspartic acid, and biodegradable polymers. B. subtilis strains have numerous advantages in industrial chemical production, such as their extensive usage as industrially-safe microorganisms, an inherent ability to use monomeric and oligomeric C5 and C6 sugars, tolerance to organic acids, low medium nutrient needs, and fast growth rates. The goal of this project is to develop an industrially-safe recombinant cellulolytic Bacillus subtilis strain that can produce high-yield fumarate from cellulosic materials in a two- step fermentation. Aerobic fermentation is used first, for fast cell mass synthesis and cellulase production, followed by anaerobic fermentation, which produces two moles of fumarate from two moles of CO2 and one mole of glucose (released from cellulose), with a theoretical yield of 1.29 g fumarate per g glucose. Compared to other dicarboxylic acids (e.g., succinic acid), the production of fumarate from cellulosic materials has balanced cofactors between the substrate and desired product, along with potentially high product yields, easy regulation of complex metabolic pathways, and low separation costs. Different from other consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) microorganisms, such as Gram- positive Clostridium spp., Gram-negative Escherichia coli, and yeast, B. subtilis strains have lots of advantages for industrial fermentation. Furthermore, we have developed several new techniques so that we can modify B. subtilis strains rapidly and easily, such as rapid scar-free chromosome knockout or knockin, directed evolution for enhanced activity secretory cellulases, and creation of the first generation recombinant cellulolytic B. subtilis. To produce high-yield fumarate from cellulosic materials and simplify product separation, the specific objectives are to (i) redirect the carbon flux to a fumarate-producing pathway, by knocking out other side-product pathways, (ii) over-express key enzymes, such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and (iii) co-express family 5, 9 and 48 cellulase genes for fast microbial cellulose utilization. This project provides a new route for generating high-yield fumarate from biomass with an industrially-safe B. subtilis strain, without the addition of costly fungal cellulase or expensive medium nutrients.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.