SBIR/STTR Research Award

Cloud Computing and Visualization Tools for KBase

Award identifier b9de0a21edf235dd0f15d8534d167c04c2c9f8fe98c3cea592cc1ab63983fefeAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,389

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
KITWARE INC
Proposal award date
2012-02-20
Contract end date
2012-11-19
UEI
DK6LPWMS5LP5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000577
Topic code
05 b

Research abstract

It is becoming abundantly clear that the scientific world is being saturated by its own data, with raw data collection increasingly outpacing researchers ability to extract meaningful knowledge from it. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the proliferation of omics fields, which are generating staggering amounts of data. This proposal offers three distinct improvements for the Kbase community by (a) designing a new architecture for genetics algorithms to be incorporated in the cloud; (b) linking these algorithms to existing Kbase databases; and (c) integrating new visualization tools into Kbase. Our work in Phase I will investigate the design of these new components and demonstrate how they will work on a sampling of algorithms from Ohio State University (OSU). In Phase II and beyond, we envision a full-featured system that enables researchers to deploy and run their new algorithms in the cloud. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: We expect researchers and corpora- tions alike to respond both to the draw of being able to use an openly available set of algorithms on-demand and to the benefits of incorporating their algorithms into a broader and more useable infrastructure. Genetics and systems biology laboratories at academic, government, and industrial research centers will desire the self-generating exposure to the community and new clients by building their own components for this system. This will clearly have a direct impact on the DOE Kbase community due to the direct links to Kbase algorithms and data. In addition to the public impact, the general market of software as a service (SaaS) is expanding rapidly and these tools will fit into this business model (see Commercialization Plan). Corporations can combine and organize these services as products to clients. Due to the open source nature of this code and the relatively low expense of cloud resources, these could be offered for free or at a very low cost. Corporations like Kitware that capitalize on collaborations will see economic benefits from working with new clients who desire to leverage and expand the platform.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

243 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $140,194,302. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.