SBIR/STTR Research Award

RF Heating Modeling Tools for Electron Cyclotron Resonance Ion Sources

Award identifier 57048253d2998f5805ec18892ff1635e832af5790e88e22c87167af522995276Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Far-Tech, Inc.
Proposal award date
2012-02-20
Contract end date
2013-03-27
UEI
LZ6MNQGKZSV3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000577
Topic code
34 d

Research abstract

The production of high-quality, high-charge-state ion beams is an area of intensive research and development worldwide for particle accelerators, atomic physics experiments, and industrial applications. In nuclear physics research, using rare isotope ion beams with extreme proton-to- neutron ratios provides insight into the synthesis of new elements and the discovery of rare nuclei. Electron cyclotron resonance ion sources (ECRIS) are used to supply high-charge state ions for all of these applications, by generating multiply charged ions through electron impact ionization in confined plasma. The key to producing high charge state ions in an ECRIS is efficient heating of the plasma electrons with electromagnetic waves. ECRIS operators have developed a number of techniques for boosting output. However, there exists only a rudimentary understanding of how these waves are absorbed by the plasma and energize the electrons. FAR-TECH, Inc. proposes to develop a suite of three sophisticated modeling tools to simulate rf heating of ECRIS plasmas by electromagnetic waves. The tools will address each aspect of the problem: wave propagation, absorption of wave energy by the electrons, and the production of ions in the confined plasma. The suite of tools will aid ECRIS users in improving the operation of existing ion sources and designing and building new ones. In order to develop comprehensive rf heating modeling tools for ECRIS plasmas, FAR- TECH proposes to perform the following during Phase I. First, a 3D COMSOL model for cavity modes with plasma will be developed. Then, characterize electron resonance with RF waves in a simple parabolic magnetic well, with a single rf wave, two waves, and with frequency tuning Finally, Monte-Carlo calculations will be made in a simple magnetic well to obtain a proper diffusion coefficient for Fokker-Plank bounce averaged electron equation that is used in FAR- TECHs Generalized ECRIS Modeling code (GEM), from which one can evaluate confinement time and extracted charge states. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Improving the efficiency of electron cyclotron resonance ion sources will improve the performance of radioactive ion beam facilities as well as industrial applications of highly charged ions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

79 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2019). Reported award amounts total $24,887,995. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.