SBIR/STTR Research Award

Complete Muon Collider Cooling Channel Design and Simulations

Award identifier c82fcdb9d4ac61c730f4c5612e5be6a5b7bb13d2ee7ec2c3b8dc3d8e47e396e8Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MUPLUS INC.
Proposal award date
2012-02-20
Contract end date
2012-11-19
UEI
GARLL9M5C245
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000577
Topic code
28 b

Research abstract

Considerable progress has been made in developing promising subsystems for muon beam cooling channels to provide the extraordinary reduction of emittance required for an energy- frontier muon collider. A high-performance front end from the target to the cooling systems have been designed and simulated, and many recent advances in theory, simulation codes, and hardware development have been achieved. However, it has not yet been demonstrated that the various proposed cooling subsystems can be consolidated into an integrated end-to-end design. This project will develop the principles and tools to optimally match the transverse and longitudinal emittance between muon beam cooling subsystems or segments that have different characteristics. An innovation that will be exploited is the theoretical framework of the Helical Cooling Channel (HCC), which allows a general analytical approach to guide the transition from one set of cooling channel parameters to another. To address the matching of transverse emittance between subsystems, the theory of the HCC (a system that combines helical dipoles with a solenoidal field) will be extended and exploited. The HCC theory, extended to include innovative matching elements such as bent solenoids, round-to- flat beam transformers, and the twin helix, will be used to guide simulations demonstrating that the emittances of promising subsystems can be matched to each other. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: A muon collider is the most promising way to provide a US facility for high-energy physics at the energy frontier. As a 1.5 TeV lepton collider it would complement the LHC and at higher energies it would have greater discovery potential than the LHC, where a 5 TeV muon collider would fit on the Fermilab site. Muon cooling is an essential part of this vision, and the project in this proposal promises to demonstrate that a complete cooling channel. Each of the discrete subsystems has shown great promise, and can be integrated into an effective end-to-end design. Appropriate R & amp;D can be said to reduce by 10% the cost of large projects, like a $10B muon collider. The scope of this proposal impacts at least 1% of the muon collider project, resulting in an estimated value of this proposal to the DOE is greater than $10 M.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2024). Reported award amounts total $2,849,857. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.