SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of an Acoustic Instrument for Bubble Size Distribution Measurement in Mercury

Award identifier d1b7ada77a373060b6d6ab8b37700cf7d38cef8eacdc126b30fc6f0390546f20Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
DYNAFLOW, INC.
Proposal award date
2012-02-20
Contract end date
2013-03-27
UEI
X2KFLRCASMG7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000577
Topic code
09 c

Research abstract

Intense pulsed pressure waves induced by proton beam impact on mercury in a spallation target propagate in the mercury and reflect from vessel walls as expansion waves resulting in cavitation damage to the walls. Injection of gas bubbles (few micrometer diameter range and void fraction of the order of 1%) into the mercury flow is one of the promising methods under investigation to mitigate the damage. Due to the opacity of mercury, a non-optical diagnostic tool is needed to quantify the injected bubble populations. The fact that bubbles have strong effects on acoustic wave propagation makes acoustic methods very good candidates for this application. This project will develop an acoustic diagnostic tool that can meet all the bubble sizing requirements for Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) applications. It will build on the technology of the present state-of-the-art acoustic bubble sizing instrument, the ABS ACOUSTIC BUBBLE SPECTROMETER, which works well for void fractions of the order of 0.1% and for bubbles between 20 and 500 m in diameter. The new instrument will use a nonlinear bubble dynamics model that extends the current linear theory utilized in the present ABS system to fully account for large bubble oscillations, bubble interactions, and strong acoustic damping. It will also use artificial intelligence (neural networks) to help solve the acoustic inverse problem and improve measurement accuracy and speed. Additionally, the proposed new method will investigate a wave reflection scheme which has the potential to outperform the wave transmission scheme currently used in ABS systems in high void fraction conditions. An acoustic instrument that is capable of measuring a wide range of bubble sizes at high void fraction will be a valuable tool for diagnostic and control of numerous multi-phase flow and liquid metal applications. Successful development of the proposed instrument will have wide commercial and scientific applications and benefits. In addition to the SNS application, the instrument will find application in oceanographic, biological, chemical, pharmaceutical, and other industrial fields.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

73 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2024). Reported award amounts total $16,579,394. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.