SBIR/STTR Research Award

Honeycomb Sandwich Structure Inspection(1001-630)

Award identifier 8c1eab66cf2fbef94344fdc6948c9225a3fb5628898c149c284dea88f4c963c8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,963

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TRITON SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
2012-01-10
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DA91DUWSMSQ7
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-253

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Triton Systems Inc, in conjunction with its OEM and small business partners, proposes the use of advanced data acquisition and analysis inspection techniques to detect and quantify skin/core disbond, crushed core and fluid intrusion defects in aircraft honeycomb sandwich structures. Triton has put together an experienced, cross-functional team to: 1. Provide coupon level simulation of real-world honeycomb sandwich structure defects; 2. Identify the defect size and type detection requirements for honeycomb sandwich structures; 3. Use the proposed NDI methods to demonstrate acquisition capability required to detect and characterize honeycomb sandwich structure defects; 4. Employ post-processing non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques to manipulate and analyze data to provide accurate characterization of detected honeycomb sandwich structure defects; 5. Notionally integrate the NDI methods and NDE techniques into a functional system; 6. Preliminarily evaluate potential higher sensitivity methods (e.g. multi-probe arrays) for greater resolution and productivity; 7. Demonstrate the integrated system on real-world problems (in Phase II); and 8. Summarize the results to estimate probability of detection (POD) for honeycomb sandwich structure defects of various sizes (in Phase II). BENEFIT: The benefits of this approach are: 1. Optimized NDE methods increase the probability of detection (POD) of defects of a certain size in a given component, regardless of location; 2. Post-inspection data manipulation provides full characterization of the defect to enable a design engineer to assess its impact on component strength and life; 3. Some level of automation of the inspection process itself ensures higher reliability than do current manual and hand-held techniques; and 4. Ultimate development of a robust POD model, in conjunction with integration with an FEA-based evaluation tool, will enable design engineers to more accurately calculate the reliability of the component over a range of potential defects. The proposed inspection methods can be applied to a wide range of advanced military and commercial aircraft that incorporate honeycomb sandwich structure components

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

927 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2026). Reported award amounts total $388,500,403. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.