SBIR/STTR Research Award

Innovative Modular Propulsion for Multi-Mission Space Vehicles

Award identifier 1c3b3330a43a18f97671c1cfd13b5fa1347c869976dd1dc2c9712027ca3714a5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,931

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Pnp Innovations, Inc.
Proposal award date
2011-11-18
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
GB8ZAQVL4J36
Solicitation number
2011.2
Topic code
AF112-071

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Early spacecraft were very expensive and took many years to painstakingly develop. The high cost and infrequency of space launches fostered a culture of exquisite performance at exquisite prices. With space access and usage becoming more prevalent, the modern metrics of development speed and cost and agility of performance outweigh exquisite performance. The"good enough"paradigm promoted by ORS allows risk management rather than risk avoidance to participate in the cost equation. The ability to add a SPA compatible, modular propulsion capability to exising spacecraft designs provides significant improvement in operational capability at moderate cost. By utilizing envionmentally safe fuels (as opposed to highly toxic hydrazine for example), the ability to pre-fuel satellites can save significant time during launch vehicle integration. Phase I will develop the initial mechanical and structural designs including spacecraft & propulsion module coupled loads analyses; a SPA compliant Propulsion Activity Agent; implementation of a SPA-S Propulsion Control ASIM; and a demo test bed to evaluate the resulting design. The result of Phase I will be a feasibility demonstration of a modular propulsion system useable for ORS Tier 2 and Tier 3 programs. BENEFIT: The use of propulsion on small platforms can be prohibitive because of overall cost and propellant handling restrictions. The combination of a modular approach coupled with higher energy density and green aspects of HPGP can address both of these issues making propulsion enabled small satellites more viable for a wider user and mission type base, e.g., DoD, NASA, commercial space (both domestic and international), university sponsored programs. Additionally, such a product type complements rideshare opportunities such as ESPA. For example, ESPA-class satellites will be able to take advantage of lower cost access to space, but can have the ability to modify their orbits since they are enabled with meaningful propulsion capability. We feel that a much broader market exists for this type of modular propulsion than just the ORS tactical satellite domain, so we expect to provide systems for other DoD agencies, NASA, and a growing number of commercial customers. The combination of modularity, non-toxic high performance green fuel, SPA compatibility, and demonstrated space hardware will be a compelling argument for future systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2014). Reported award amounts total $2,270,465. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.