SBIR/STTR Research Award

Innovative Optical Monitoring System for Performance Assessment of Cutting Tools

Award identifier e4bc7730d48c05f3d3b1371c34c5b4dd69a0dc90f11c2065a4189e2ee953e67dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,988

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Physical Optics Corporation
Proposal award date
2011-09-28
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DG3AB4E8R4D8
Solicitation number
2011.2
Topic code
AF112-114

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: To address the Air Force need for in-process monitoring of machine tool wear, Physical Optics Corporation (POC) proposes to develop an Innovative optical Monitoring system for Performance Assessment of Cutting Tools (IMPACT). This proposed system is based on a new design that uses POC-developed mature components and commercial off-the-shelf components. The innovative strategy for isolating vibrations of interest will enable the system to determine the condition of cutting tools during the course of routine production. As a result, this system enables the end user to replace or refurbish worn cutting tools before performance falls below the required work piece quality requirements. This directly addresses the Air Force Research Laboratory"s (AFRL"s) requirements of periodic production tool inspection. In Phase I, POC will demonstrate the feasibility of IMPACT by correlating machine part quality with the measurable outputs of our sensor system. In Phase II, POC plans to develop a prototype system to show how the approach solves the problem in a production-relevant environment. BENEFIT: In addition to the fabrication of military aircraft, the IMPACT system will find application in parts machining for commercial aircraft, shipbuilding, the automotive industry, and other industries in which automated quality control of the machining process will deliver the benefits of cost reduction and performance improvement. This system will enhance production quality and yield by maintaining the optimal machining conditions and helping ensure the timely replacement of cutting tools. The proposed system will also reduce manufacturing costs by reducing material waste on failed parts as well as reducing manpower and resources required for cutting tool maintenance.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,933 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2021). Reported award amounts total $549,686,800. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.