SBIR/STTR Research Award

Composite Aluminum Aircraft Matting for High-Temperature Applications

Award identifier f32f794ddd3dd5bbfd7d0b4bcb7d0460c4ab7f788f77a803e58813ce0e430edcAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
POWDERMET INC
Proposal award date
2011-09-26
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
TK9JT3DMDW14
Solicitation number
2011.2
Topic code
AF112-116

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Current mats are manufactured from aluminum 6061 because of its relatively high strength-to-weight ratio and durability. However, 6061 does not maintain these desirable characteristics when exposed to higher temperatures, where it loses strength significantly above 150 degrees C. This makes 6061 very undesirable for high temperature applications, where the mats could be exposed to temperatures of up to 1700 degrees F. It is also desirable that aircraft landing mats have high thermal conductivity so that concentrations of high temperatures can be quickly dissipated to the surrounding material. Currently, the top surface of the mat is coated with an epoxy-based, non-skid coating. This coating requires frequent replacement due to wear or breakdown from the environment. Powdermet, along with its subsidiary/spin-out MesoCoat Inc, propose to demonstrate an extrudable, nanocomposite, aluminum metal matrix composite as a high temperature, high strength-to-weight ratio matting material which can be directly substituted for 6061 aluminum and reduce weight in landing mats by 20% or more. Furthermore we propose to demonstrate the application of a thermally insulating low density (microballoon-reinforced) superalloy metal matrix syntactic composite thermal protection coating system (with non-skid properties) to reduce mat temperatures and extend matting life when used in jet exhaust wash environments. BENEFIT: There are multiple applications for high temperature aluminum to replace titanium and higher density materials in transportation and aerospace systems, including nanocomposite aluminum landing mats, and thermal barrier non-skid topcoat, refurbishment or OEM landing mat coating and refurbishment services, applying the metallic non-skid to both existing and original parts. A non-skid surface with enhanced heat resistant capabilities will be required, to meet the operational envelope of the Joint Strike Fighter and MV-22 aircraft. Specifically, nozzle exhaust gas temperatures will be much higher than produced by previous Vertical Take-Off and Landing aircraft.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

123 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2024). Reported award amounts total $29,889,391. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.